Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E

2012-02-15 Thread Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
PR718485: Workaround: Disable the "then log" or "then syslog" in firewall configuration. Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2012, 12:28 +0100 schrieb Per Randrup Nielsen: > PR718485 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ juniper-ns

Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E

2012-02-15 Thread Per Randrup Nielsen
What workaround is available? /Per -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] På vegne af Frank Blankman Sendt: 13. februar 2012 18:02 Til: David Temkin Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Emne: Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E We've

Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E

2012-02-13 Thread Frank Blankman
22 13 >> david@orange.com >> >> JNCIE-M&T/SP #703 >> JNCIP-ENT >> >> -Message d'origine----- >> De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net >> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Daniel Roesen >> Envoyé : mer

Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E

2012-02-13 Thread David Temkin
iper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Daniel Roesen Envoyé : mercredi 8 février 2012 07:44 À : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +, OBrien, Will wrote: Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh

Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E

2012-02-08 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:44:10AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > So as far as things stand, SCB-E not deployable before mid 2012 > earliest if (and that's a big "if" when looking at 10.4 experience) > 11.4R3 is going to be usable. Given the state of the code and the lack of faith/experience i

Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E

2012-02-08 Thread david.roy
: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Objet : Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +, OBrien, Will wrote: > Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh > MX480s ready to roll out. I'm curious what code your running. Given that there is only one publi

Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E

2012-02-07 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +, OBrien, Will wrote: > Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh > MX480s ready to roll out. I'm curious what code your running. Given that there is only one public JUNOS release which supports SCB-E, there aren't many options: