PR718485:
Workaround:
Disable the "then log" or "then syslog" in firewall configuration.
Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2012, 12:28 +0100 schrieb Per Randrup Nielsen:
> PR718485
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
juniper-ns
What workaround is available?
/Per
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] På vegne af Frank Blankman
Sendt: 13. februar 2012 18:02
Til: David Temkin
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Emne: Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E
We've
22 13
>> david@orange.com
>>
>> JNCIE-M&T/SP #703
>> JNCIP-ENT
>>
>> -Message d'origine-----
>> De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Daniel Roesen
>> Envoyé : mer
iper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] De la part de Daniel Roesen
Envoyé : mercredi 8 février 2012 07:44
À : juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Objet : Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +, OBrien, Will wrote:
Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:44:10AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> So as far as things stand, SCB-E not deployable before mid 2012
> earliest if (and that's a big "if" when looking at 10.4 experience)
> 11.4R3 is going to be usable.
Given the state of the code and the lack of faith/experience i
: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Objet : Re: [j-nsp] SCB-E
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +, OBrien, Will wrote:
> Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh
> MX480s ready to roll out. I'm curious what code your running.
Given that there is only one publi
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:23:11AM +, OBrien, Will wrote:
> Anyone running the SCB-E? I've got a stack of them with a set of fresh
> MX480s ready to roll out. I'm curious what code your running.
Given that there is only one public JUNOS release which supports SCB-E,
there aren't many options:
7 matches
Mail list logo