Hi,
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 18:46 +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
> >>- Why is the security not finished? No one seriously using this plugin
> >>yet? Why not?
[...]
> Do you have a schedule/roadmap/timeline for this to be completed?
Here is the tracking PR for GNU Classpath's security implementa
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 11:52, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> I have a few more things I want to do before making a release of this,
> but I thought people might want to know about this so they can
> immediately set to fixing those 4 remaining errors to claim complete 1.1
> and 1.0 coverage :)
>
I com
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 10:00, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] will help you better than
> me. I Cc them.
>
> Thanks for your time,
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> __
> From: James Damour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 23:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 09:35:04AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I updated the tarball according to minor changes of GCJ's
> > java-gui-branch, and apply Dalibor Topic's holdsLock pure java
> > implementation[1]. Now, both AWT and Swin
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:42, James Simmons wrote:
>Just wanted to give up a update at where I am on the port. I have all
> the skeleton classes avalable for a xlib peer. No functionality. I attempted
> to make a XFramePeer class but the under lying structue was missing. The
> under lying str
