On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:38:25 -0700
"bhanu nani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if I have an ioctl that passes me some data in a structure which I
> have to process and return the result as a field in the structure.
> Is it acceptable if I copy the entire structure with copy_to_user()
> instead of cop
Hi Guys,
I am working on a driver that I plan to submit to the Linux sources in
the next few month on the PPC communication processor Architecture.
That makes me little worried about the acceptance of this driver into
the Linux tree.
if I have an ioctl that passes me some data in a structure whic
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Bradley Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am researching real-time computing through different projects at
> school. Is anyone else working on real-time research with the Linux kernel?
Hi. Check this one:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
I think
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Bradley Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am researching real-time computing through different projects at
> school. Is anyone else working on real-time research with the Linux kernel?
>
> I am focusing on using power measurement, in one project, with an
> embedd
On 04-07-08 18:28, Peter Teoh wrote:
And for the phenomena of "unbounded priority inversion", I found this
very useful:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/10/52
Thank you to Rene and Roberto for the discussion.
Just a final note; note that the above linked document does use a
slightly differen
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04-07-08 02:05, Peter Teoh wrote:
>
>> I seeeh...or I don't see..the original problem was that the
>> highest prio cannot acquire the lock, even though it has the highest prio.
>
> No. That is or was not the problem
Hi,
for my project I would like to design an ARM9 based single board computer (SBC)
using the cirrus logic EP9302 CPU:
http://www.cirrus.com/en/pubs/proDatasheet/EP9302_PP3.pdf
http://www.cirrus.com/en/pubs/manual/EP93xx_Users_Guide_UM1.pdf
My goal is to use existing linux drivers together with
On 04-07-08 02:05, Peter Teoh wrote:
I seeeh...or I don't see..the original problem was that the
highest prio cannot acquire the lock, even though it has the highest
prio.
No. That is or was not the problem. This I believe is the fundamental
misunderstanding left.
Please note how I
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 12:31 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> This should go through David's tree, right?
yes.
Thank you,
Jaswinder Singh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
> also I wanted to know if the Signed-off was done correctly because I
> am not sure where else to put it.
Usually, the SO is the last line in the patch description area.
Regards,
tavi
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clea
10 matches
Mail list logo
