very good discussion
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Luciano Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:28:07PM +0530, rishi agrawal wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I would like to know about the use of "losetup".
>>
>> By use I want mean that in what all situations will I
to see ALL the syscall made for a userspace program, use "strace".
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Pharaoh . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> As per my understanding, whenever a signal handler is returned, sigreturn()
> system call
> is called, so just to test my understanding I wrote a si
On Monday 20 October 2008 17:40:21 Ahmed Sammoud wrote:
> Hello again
>
> Well sorry if i didn't make my self clear in the first time ,
> What i mean is that the users can connect to it to authenticate ,
>
> What i want to do in brief :
> I want to do is a Server that allows user to connect to it ,
Hello again
Well sorry if i didn't make my self clear in the first time ,
What i mean is that the users can connect to it to authenticate ,
What i want to do in brief :
I want to do is a Server that allows user to connect to it ,and login to
their accounts ,
the server should authenticate the us
On Monday 20 October 2008 14:15:25 asammoud asammoud wrote:
> Hello every one ,
> I'm new to kernel development , and i want to know if i can make a kernel
> module that connects to
> the internet and allow users to login and execute commands,
What do you mean 'connect to the Internet'? Normally,
Hello every one ,
I'm new to kernel development , and i want to know if i can make a kernel
module that connects to
the internet and allow users to login and execute commands,
What i want to know is :
How can i check for users login from kernel space , And can i use the login
program in the kerne
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:28:07PM +0530, rishi agrawal wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I would like to know about the use of "losetup".
>
> By use I want mean that in what all situations will I use losetup. Its
> okay that it attaches a loop device to any regular file but how do we
> use this featu
One practical usage is while using Linux USB file-storage gadget driver.
When you want to access data
written by USB host on regular file on gadget itself, you can do losetup on
the regular file. After associating
loop device to regular file, the device becomes valid block device allowing
you to pe
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Sandeep K Sinha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi Rishi,
>
> You can now do a mkfs on that particular file, mount it and do
> whatever you can do with a normal block device.
>
> Read more about "loopback devices".
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:28 PM, rishi agrawa
Hi Rishi,
You can now do a mkfs on that particular file, mount it and do
whatever you can do with a normal block device.
Read more about "loopback devices".
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:28 PM, rishi agrawal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I would like to know about the use of
Hi
As per my understanding, whenever a signal handler is returned, sigreturn()
system call
is called, so just to test my understanding I wrote a simple app with signal
handler and
tried to put a breakpoint at sigreturn call, but I could never hit that
breakpoint.
How can one figure out how return
Hello Everyone,
I would like to know about the use of "losetup".
By use I want mean that in what all situations will I use losetup. Its
okay that it attaches a loop device to any regular file but how do we
use this feature.
--
Regards,
Rishi B. Agrawal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hi All,
This is regarding the mailing list filters. I could not find any help on
this.
Recently i had a problem. I have sent a mail to I2C mailing list for
help and no one replied.
After 2 days i realised that my mail went with a disclaimer at the end.
I am almost sure thats the reason no one
I assume you are talking purely about user space here? So your problems
boils down to this:
Your compiler is unamble to find definition of certain symbols (that
have been defined in the header files). Since you compiler is
complaining that means it is certainly not able to find the libraries
usin
Hi List,
My issue is not exactly related to Kernel.
Here I am trying to build my module with the existing code present in linux
environment using existing header file and library file present in different
directories.
The problem is, my make file is not able to find the library files of the
header
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Daniel Baluta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> I want to understand how kernel handles signals delivering between processes.
> Can you guide me through kernel code , or provide some basics ideas.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan.
>
http://www.freeos.com/articles/4536
ch
16 matches
Mail list logo