Re: Halp required

2009-10-10 Thread abhijeet tripathi
--- On Sun, 11/10/09, abhish agarwal wrote: From: abhish agarwal Subject: Halp required To: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org Date: Sunday, 11 October, 2009, 10:04 AM Hi All, IN HTTPD I am getting following error. Can someone please tell me how to interpret it? httpd: net_connect: FD=5 already exists

Re: Mobile OS

2009-10-10 Thread Michael Blizek
Hi! On 23:46 Sat 10 Oct , Niamathullah sharief wrote: > Hi friends, >I want to learn about Mobile operating systems. So i started with > android. May i know what are all the Other Open Source Mobile Free Operating > System available? Android is neither an operating system nor open. It is

Re: preempt_disable() as a synchronization tool

2009-10-10 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hi . On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Daniel Rodrick wrote: > Firstly, Does preempt_disable() disable the preemption on all the > processors or on just the local processor? Just the local processor AFAIK. > Secondly, a preempt_disable() a suffifient synchronization technique > to guard a da

Halp required

2009-10-10 Thread abhish agarwal
Hi All, IN HTTPD I am getting following error. Can someone please tell me how to interpret it? httpd: net_connect: FD=5 already exists with connectiontype=1 Thanks,Abhish Yahoo! India has a new look. Take a sneak peek http://in.yahoo.com/trynew

Mobile OS

2009-10-10 Thread Niamathullah sharief
Hi friends, I want to learn about Mobile operating systems. So i started with android. May i know what are all the Other Open Source Mobile Free Operating System available? Thank you

Re: preempt_disable() as synchronization tool

2009-10-10 Thread vinit dhatrak
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:16 AM, askb wrote: > >> > >> > Lastly, is it allowable to schedule / sleep immediately after a call >> > to preempt_disable()? >> >> No I guess kernel will panic with some error like , "scheduling while >> in Atomic Context". > > Sorry, I somehow missed out reading this.

/dev/console (deleted)

2009-10-10 Thread Bizhan Gholikhamseh (bgholikh)
HI All, I am running kernel 2.6.23. And I see something strange that I can not find an answer for it: # ls -al 1/fd dr-x--2 root root0 Jan 5 12:23 . dr-xr-xr-x5 root root0 Jan 5 12:22 .. lrwx--1 root root 64 Jan 5 12:23 0 -> /de

Re: USB controller driver question

2009-10-10 Thread Pranith
Vishal Thanki wrote: I want to understand that what should be the ideal frequency to send PING tokens. Should it be very aggressive? I searched through the code of ehci driver in linux kernel, but could not figure out where the exactly PING protocol is implemented in that. Can you please point