You can look into this:-
http://libdlo.freedesktop.org/wiki/
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Microbit_Ubuntu <
micro...@virginbroadband.com.au> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> Since some time I've wondered about using a small LCD monitor that
> connects via USB rather than VGA or DVI.
> They seem to be
Hi Ozan...
2010/1/17 Ozan Türkyılmaz :
> hi all,
>
> there were a some talk about how write access is needed for ro mount
> ext3. however unlike
> the guy called it bad design and such, i like to know why. where it
> comes from, why it is so.
I'm not the best guy to help you shed a light on this,
Hi group,
Since some time I've wondered about using a small LCD monitor that
connects via USB rather than VGA or DVI.
They seem to be rare and somewhat pricey, but since they do exist
I've always wondered whether Linux actually supports such thing, I
certainly can't see it it my kernel.
I also no
Hi!
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 14:18 +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fre, 2010-01-15 at 03:47 +1100, Microbit_Ubuntu wrote:
> [...]
> > Having dug around more, I am now getting the impression that my problem
> > is actually NOT getting console tty1 output to my serial ttyS0...
> >
> > Eg
Hello,
i just want to know about the multimedia framework in video. i googled for
that but i didn't get what i need. i want to know how this multimedia is
supported in kernel. what are the drivers and file need for this?i want to
know the complete architecture. if it uses gstreamer for multimedia,
Yes,
Thank you for helping me to understand the idea and concept. Have a great
day!
Best Regards,
Daniel (Youngwhan) Song
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> Hi Daniel
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Daniel (Youngwhan) Song
> wrote:
> > Thank you, Mulyadi, n
hi all,
there were a some talk about how write access is needed for ro mount
ext3. however unlike
the guy called it bad design and such, i like to know why. where it
comes from, why it is so.
--
Ozan
オザン
Close the world, txEn eht nepO
ps: link to thread that isnparied this mail:
http://www.li
Hi Daniel
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Daniel (Youngwhan) Song
wrote:
> Thank you, Mulyadi, now, I could understand about NPTL implementation and
> lightweight process concept.
Glad you make it :)
> One thing I want to check is that it looks that the system call, clone()
> eventual
Thank you, Mulyadi, now, I could understand about NPTL implementation and
lightweight process concept.
One thing I want to check is that it looks that the system call, clone()
eventually calls do_fork() in fork.c (
http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.32/kernel/fork.c#L1375) which is the last
stage of
Hi Daniel
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Daniel (Youngwhan) Song
wrote:
> To confirm again,
>
> Since kernel thread by kernel_thread() is created by do_fork() in the
> kernel, pthread_create() uses clone() system call which eventually calls
> do_fork() in the kernel, and fork() in user spac
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:02:02 -0800, Nagaprabhanjan Bellari
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had a problem where we were trying to debug why events/0 was taking
98%
> of CPU time. I found that writing a ‘t’ to /proc/sysrq-trigger will
> dump the
> stack traces of all processes. Unfortunately, events/0 was
Thank you for the information, Mulyadi and askb,
To confirm again,
Since kernel thread by kernel_thread() is created by do_fork() in the
kernel, pthread_create() uses clone() system call which eventually calls
do_fork() in the kernel, and fork() in user space calls eventually do_fork()
as well, a
12 matches
Mail list logo
