On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:34, Group wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I agree with what you said. Is there any code related
> to this available in kernel or any other source? as It would be more helpful
> to understand this concept.
To the best (in my getting rusty) knowledge, accessing other threa
Thanks for your reply. I agree with what you said. Is there any code related
to this available in kernel or any other source? as It would be more helpful
to understand this concept.
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Vimal wrote:
> On 4 June 2010 17:16, Group wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible
ok, based on the feedback today, i'm going to go back to the drawing
board and try again. i already have an idea of how to do this
differently but i'll ponder it for a while first. i'll probably make
an alternate suggestion tomorrow and people will either think it's a
good idea or not but i pr
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Vimal wrote:
>> On 4 June 2010 17:16, Group wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to access threads stack (not shared) from another thread?
>>> I have seen an API which gets the attributes for the stack
>>>
On Jun 5, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
sorry, but that's just not going to happen. ever. if the
general impression here is that, for a donation of five bucks,
you expect to get unfettered access to my personal attention
2010/5/31 luca ellero :
> Pei Lin wrote:
>>
>> 2010/5/17 luca ellero :
>>
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>> I have some (maybe stupid) questions which I can't answer even after
>>> reading
>>> lots of documentation.
>>> Suppose I have a PCI device which has some I/O registers mapped to memory
>>> (here I mean a
>> sorry, but that's just not going to happen. ever. if the general
>> impression here is that, for a donation of five bucks, you expect to
>> get unfettered access to my personal attention, then we have massively
>> different views of how the world works.
>
> Well, 5 bucks was just an example.
On Jun 5, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> whoa, whoa, whoa ... that's going *way* beyond what i was
> suggesting. i was proposing that i could produce and provide
> well-written kernel programming docs online, write new content on a
> reasonably regular basis and make sure i kept al
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Carlo Caione wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >
> > i was reluctant to post the following since it's definitely going
> > to sound self-serving but it's an idea i've been thinking about
> > for a while.
> >
> > how many people would be willi
On Jun 5, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i was reluctant to post the following since it's definitely going to
> sound self-serving but it's an idea i've been thinking about for a
> while.
>
> how many people would be willing to spend, say, 5 dollars for a
> decently-written on
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> If you are sure about constantly adding new material etc, then I
> think a good idea would be to turn it into a subscription based
> service at $3 / month or something (too less?), something like LWN.
> I know I would signup for something
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> If you are sure about constantly adding new material etc, then I think
> a good idea would be to turn it into a subscription based service at
> $3 / month or something (too less?), something like LWN. I know I
> would signup fo
i was reluctant to post the following since it's definitely going to
sound self-serving but it's an idea i've been thinking about for a
while.
how many people would be willing to spend, say, 5 dollars for a
decently-written online booklet that introduces someone to the field
of kernel program
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 19:58, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
... snip ...
> > i mention them as i was one of the pre-pub technical reviewers on
> > that first book, and i am the technical editor of the second one.
>
> Great (again). May I (and maybe some of
14 matches
Mail list logo
