>
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Bruce Blinn wrote:
>
> > New task structures are added into the list in kernel/fork.c (line
> > 1743 in my source).
>
> that's not what i see here, can you reproduce the few lines
> at that point? i had assumed it was in fork.
> > > that also suggests that a passage on p. 91 of LKD3 is
> inaccurate,
> > > where it claims that "because the lists are circular, you can
> > > generally pass any element for head." but that can't be right,
> > > since you must *always* keep track of the head node for
> any list, to
>
>
> that also suggests that a passage on p. 91 of LKD3 is
> inaccurate, where it claims that "because the lists are
> circular, you can generally pass any element for head." but
> that can't be right, since you must *always* keep track of
> the head node for any list, to avoid processing it
>
> if permissions are 700 or 400 who cares you need root to do
> either and at that point if its 400 can't you just chmod 700
> /dev/kallsyms. or am I missing something here?
>
For files in the /proc file system, it is not that simple since they need to
have a function to handle the write req
-Original Message-
From: kernelnewbies-bou...@nl.linux.org
[mailto:kernelnewbies-bou...@nl.linux.org] On Behalf Of Anuz Pratap Singh
Tomar
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:11 AM
To: Srdjan Todorovic
Cc: Mukesh Yadav; kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: Not able to boot Linux-2.6.33.2
I
> -Original Message-
> From: kernelnewbies-bou...@nl.linux.org
> [mailto:kernelnewbies-bou...@nl.linux.org] On Behalf Of Greg KH
> Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 1:27 PM
> To: Shawn
> Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
> Subject: Re: question about __v annotation
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 a
-Original Message-
From: kernelnewbies-bou...@nl.linux.org
[mailto:kernelnewbies-bou...@nl.linux.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Austad
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:52 AM
To: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Cc: Daniel Baluta; Kevin Wilson
Subject: Re: Building a kernel and configuration items
