6.28-11-generic'
> But there is no module means .ko file generated . Can anybody help me?
> Thanks in advance.
It seems like your Makefile is wrong. Can you show it?
--
Nikolay N. Ivanov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecar..
it or exit function?
Thanks.
--
Nikolay N. Ivanov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
it or exit function?
Thanks.
--
Nikolay N. Ivanov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
Hi, Jesper!
On Птн, Сен 14, 2007 at 10:27:58 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 14/09/2007, Nikolay N. Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But why my modules uses headers from KSRC/include/linux instead of
> > /usr/include/linux? I clarify it because my OLD version of
&
27;t one: kbuild complains,
when I try to use UTS_RELEASE without including utsrelease.h.
I wonder why system holds old version of kernel headers in
/usr/include/linux.
> Someone correct me if I'm wrong on that.
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Boyanov
--
Nikolay N. Ivanov
--
To
is KERNELSOURCE/include. But my
question is: what difference between KERNELSOURCE/include/linux
directory and /usr/include/linux directory?
Thanx in advance.
--
Nikolay N. Ivanov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
ernel build.
So, because my attempt to compile module with UTS_RELEASE failed, I
determine that kernel include directory is KERNELSOURCE/include. But my
question is: what difference between KERNELSOURCE/include/linux
directory and /usr/include/linux directory?
Thanx in advance.
--
Nikolay N. Iva
