ECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:06 AM
To: Thippeswamy, Aravind; kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: RE: IPX performance
Hi Aravind,
It pays to be precise when talking about these terms. "Software
Interrupt" is a bit of a misnomer because software never really
interrupts a cpu
;software interrupt". Maybe this is what
you want to know?
Hope this helps!
Cheers
Al
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thippeswamy,
Aravind
Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2007 3:51 a.m.
To: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: RE: IPX perfor
Hi,
Can any one kindly tell me what "Software Interrupt" exactly
means? Also, how is it different from the "Hardware Interrupt"?
Regards,
Aravind.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
-Mat Cauthon (WoT).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL
Rafal Cygnarowski escreveu:
Hi!
I use old mars_nwe but have problems with its performance. It works really
poor. I would like to check if it's just IPX subsystem problem (== kernel
problem?) or just poor mars_nwe code. Unfortunately I can't find any IPX
benchmarks and I have no real Netware serv
