Le Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:40:01 +0200,
DEGREMONT Aurelien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Yes, yes, I know this will be a lot simpler in user-space, but, if i
> trying to do this in kernel space, it is not because I'm masochist,
> but because I need it. If this is not possible or, it is really too
Yes, yes, I know this will be a lot simpler in user-space, but, if i
trying to do this in kernel space, it is not because I'm masochist, but
because I need it. If this is not possible or, it is really too
difficult I will try to do otherwise, but I want to be sure before
changing my plans. Sa
Hi Aurélien,
(Hope your Canada trip after OLS was nice !)
Le Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:54:52 +0200,
DEGREMONT Aurelien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> 3 - Is the only solution to code a userspace daemon for doing that,
> and just use a mechanism to communicate between this daemon and the
> kernel? T
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Mulyadi Santosa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> What you're trying to do is whole lot easier and less complex if you
> do it (mostly) in user space.Do fork(), then probably coordinate via
> mutex, signal or simply do wait().
>
> Please notice that I don't say you'r
Hi
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:54 PM, DEGREMONT Aurelien
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I need to be able to start and manage several user-processes from a kernel
> module.
> By managing, i mean, read the process output, wait for its end, kill it
> sooner if needed.
> It looks like the
Hello all!
I need to be able to start and manage several user-processes from a
kernel module.
By managing, i mean, read the process output, wait for its end, kill it
sooner if needed.
It looks like the mecanisms offered by call_usermodehelper() but, more
sophisticated.
I did some code, looking
