Hi, Jesper!
On Птн, Сен 14, 2007 at 10:27:58 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 14/09/2007, Nikolay N. Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But why my modules uses headers from KSRC/include/linux instead of
> > /usr/include/linux? I clarify it because my OLD version of
> > /usr/include/linux/version.
On 14/09/2007, Nikolay N. Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But why my modules uses headers from KSRC/include/linux instead of
> /usr/include/linux? I clarify it because my OLD version of
> /usr/include/linux/version.h has UTS_RELEASE macro, whereas
> KSRC/include/linux/version.h (NEW kernel) has
Hi, Konstantin!
On Птн, Сен 14, 2007 at 09:09:25 +0200, Konstantin Boyanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, no the version.h in $KSRC/linux/include/ doesnt get generated
> when you compile the kernel. I didin't get your point, what are you trying
> to do actually with this file?
I'm trying to play
Hello!
I played with macroses from version.h (UTS_RELEASE, LINUX_VERSION_CODE
and KERNEL_VERSION()) and I didn't found UTS_RELEASE in
KERNELSOURCE/include/linux/version.h. My current kernel version is
2.6.22.5 and my sacrifical distro is Slackware 11. When I open the
/usr/include/linux/version.h f
Hello!
I played with macroses from version.h (UTS_RELEASE, LINUX_VERSION_CODE
and KERNEL_VERSION()) and I didn't found UTS_RELEASE in
KERNELSOURCE/include/linux/version.h. But with google's help I've found
that UTS_RELEASE is now in the utsrelease.h. But it's not a question.
My current kernel ver
