>>> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:06 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>
>> I bet it has something to do with the local_irq_disable vs clgi in the
> kvm_run() code.
>>
>
> clgi() overrides local irq, so I don't see how that happen
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:58 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>>
Passes the usual tests, and offers an 11% speedup. There is another
>>> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:58 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>> Passes the usual tests, and offers an 11% speedup. There is another
>>> enhancement not included here (coming shortly) which exposes anothe
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> Passes the usual tests, and offers an 11% speedup. There is another
>> enhancement not included here (coming shortly) which exposes another 12%
>> speedup over this as well. Stay tuned
>>
>>
> This fails on amd, locks up completely. Bisecting now.
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Passes the usual tests, and offers an 11% speedup. There is another
> enhancement not included here (coming shortly) which exposes another 12%
> speedup over this as well. Stay tuned
>
>
This fails on amd, locks up completely. Bisecting now. lapic.c needs a
#include
Changelog: v7 plus the following:
1) Rebased on git-head
2) Removed level-senstive patch. I re-read the spec more carefully and we had
it right the first time.
3) Got rid of sigprocmask from vcpu_halt per comments
Passes the usual tests, and offers an 11% speedup. There is another
enhancement
