Hi,
Fedora 4, 2.6.15.6
What is the maximum count of qdiscs attached to one dev ?
It seems, that only 2048 qdiscs can be attached. Is this correct
?
If I try to attache more qdiscs, it complains that file already
exists and error talking to kernel.
How to increase this co
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 23:30 +0200, Piotr Chytla wrote:
> apply also patch from attachment. 2.6.17 needs matchsize in ipt_match struct.
Whoopsie. I missed that in the patch I sent to netfilter-devel a while
ago.
Thanks for doing it yourself.
Regards,
Torsten
_
Add code to initialize rb tree nodes, and check for double deletion.
This is not a real fix, but I can make it trap sometimes and may
be a bandaid for: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6681
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_htb.c | 34 +
The HTB network scheduler had debug code that wouldn't compile
and confused and obfuscated the code, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_htb.c | 302 ++-
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 268 deletion
Change the conditional compilation around HTB_HYSTERSIS
since code was splitting mid expression.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_htb.c | 27 +--
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/
Add code to initialize rb tree nodes, and check for double deletion.
This is not a real fix, but I can make it trap sometimes and may
be a bandaid for: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6681
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_htb.c | 34 +
Use hlist instead of list for the hash list. This saves
space, and we can check for double delete better.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_htb.c | 49 +++--
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff
The HTB scheduler code is a mess, this patch set does some basic
house cleaning. The first four should cause no code change, but the
last two need more testing.
--
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"And in the Packet there writ down that doome"
___
Get rid of the macro's being used to obscure the locking.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_htb.c | 18 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
index 73094e7..c0b80b7 100644
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:52:39PM +0200, Torsten Luettgert wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:55 +0200, gerald HUET wrote:
> > [ 5333.87] ip_tables: u32 match: invalid size 0 !=
> > 2028
> > iptables: Unknown error -1
> >
> > I tried to do some modifications on ipt_u32.c
> > following modific
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:55 +0200, gerald HUET wrote:
> [ 5333.87] ip_tables: u32 match: invalid size 0 !=
> 2028
> iptables: Unknown error -1
>
> I tried to do some modifications on ipt_u32.c
> following modifications which work for ipp2p
> (http://www.sieglitzhof.net/~doc/ipp2p/) without an
Hi,
I'm not convinced I'm facing a bug, I was reading some code and
also reading some threads and finally reached this conclusion, please
let me know if it's not clear enough and also if you don't agree :
- The case it shows the flag with iproute is
because it's using a single flag set.
Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2006 17:33 schrieb former03 | Baltasar Cevc:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm trying to set up routing for 2 links to the internet on a box
> which produces traffic itself (e.g. DNS) and will route all our local
> traffic.
>
> AS one route is quick and expensive and the other one slow a
hi everybody,
I used to test this rules on my gateway :
iptables -I FORWARD -p udp -m length --length 39 -m
u32 --u32 '27&0x8f=7' --u32 '31=0x527c4833' -j DROP
This was working with a 2.6.16 kernel but now i
upgraded to 2.6.17 it give me the following message :
[ 5333.87] ip_tables: u32 match
14 matches
Mail list logo
