This is an update to the iproute2 command set.
It can be downloaded from:
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.18-061214.tar.gz
Repository:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git
For more info on iproute2 see:
http://linux-net.osdl.org/
Flechsenhaar, Jon J wrote:
I want to limit pps (packets per second) not just bandwidth on the
ingress side. I can do this using IP tables but I'm curious if there is
a way to do this with TC.
Thanks.
I don't think so, maybe you could ask on netdev netdev@vger.kernel.org
and/or jamal [EMAI
drew einhorn wrote:
I'd like to initially assign all http flows to a interactive priority
queue.
But if the cumulative amount of traffic exceeds a threshold, I'd like
to reassign it to a low priority bulk queue. Say someone is doing an
http download of a huge .iso.
Is this possible?
You could
Eye of the Beholder wrote:
Hello.
I have a 1024/256kbit ADSL and tried to shape outgoing traffic in order
to improve latency.
Here is my config.
UPLOAD_RATE="256"
UPRATE="$[4*$UPLOAD_RATE/5]" (a little smaller)
Depends on traffic - you may need to go smaller if there are lots of
small packe
Sébastien CRAMATTE wrote:
Hello,
I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC
http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/
I’ve got few questions ?
Considering this
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \
rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \
ls m1 ${UPL
Thossapron Apinyapanha wrote:
tc class add dev eth2 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc sc m2 1kbit
If it's really 10mbit eth, 10mbit rate is too high.
tc class add dev eth2 parent 1:11 classid 1:199 hfsc rt m1 3500kbit d 10s m2
500kbit ls m2 3500kbit ul m2 3500kbit
tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle
My hfsc rule ..
tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle 1: root hfsc
iptables -t mangle -N ms-all
iptables -t mangle -N ms-all-chains
iptables -t mangle -N ms-prerouting
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j ms-prerouting
iptables -t mangle -A ms-prerouting -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
iptables -t mangle -A
Are you sure you want to block ICMP how about PMTU
ebtables -I FORWARD 1 -i eth0 -p ip --ip-protocol icmp
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 21:34 +0900, William Bohannan wrote:
> Thanks for that. Would you be able to give a simple example on how to
> block outgoing traffic using ebtables and icmp? as I g
Thanks for that. Would you be able to give a simple example on how to
block outgoing traffic using ebtables and icmp? as I get an error when
using icmp?
ebtables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -p icmp -j DROP
Error message - "Problem with the specified protocol."
Kind Regards
William
-Original Mes
Hi
Physdev may no longer be supported soon something to do with hooks
and how this is difficult to support. I have stopped using it cause I
found some odd behavior in physdev-in, out seemed fine I remember. I use
ebtables and marks for this now.
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 20:55 +0900, William Boha
I have ip_nat_sip compiled in the kernel (and not as a module). Is that
an issue?
Could you give me an example of how I could do using CONNMARK and fwmark
based routing if I have an outgoing RTP flow bound to the wrong interface?
Thanks a lot,
François.
Patrick McHardy wrote:
François Delaw
Currently using physdev on a bridge to try and isolate certain paths
across and to the bridge. It all works except when trying to stop the
flow in one direction on the FORWARD chain?? Can someone please help??
Below is the testing done so far.
eth1 <---> BRIDGE <---> eth0
# Block (eth0 ---> eth
I unfortunately think that I can't use that solution (if I understood it
well).
My box actually has two functions, it's an Asterisk box and a load
balancing router.
For LAN clients, as this box represents their default gateway, there
would be no problem in implementing a pure routing solutio
13 matches
Mail list logo
