* Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:11:29
+0100]:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:53:02 +0300
Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Fri, 7 Dec 2007
> 13:16:44 +0100]:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:12:12 +0300
> > Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:53:02 +0300
Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Fri, 7 Dec 2007
> 13:16:44 +0100]:
> > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:12:12 +0300
> > Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > package1, have incl1 in -Fi tunable
> > > project2, h
* Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:16:44
+0100]:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:12:12 +0300
Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> package1, have incl1 in -Fi tunable
> project2, have package1 in requirements
> may i include files, located in incl1, to project2's sources ?
Wh
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:12:12 +0300
Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Wed, 5 Dec 2007
> 20:09:59 +0100]:
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:45:10 +0300
> > Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > May i don't prescription project's include path if it
* Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Wed, 5 Dec 2007 20:09:59
+0100]:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:45:10 +0300
Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May i don't prescription project's include path if it already
> prescribed to required package ?
> Have differences of prescription include direct
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:45:10 +0300
Andrey Gusev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Units paths options is inherited by packages requirements (to
> project). This rule is applicable to include paths options ?
Yes, but I know only a few artificial cases where this makes sense.
See package editor / Option
