Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license for business: meh

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Kaiser
Frederik Ramm schrieb: And as for me being a "key player" - I am writing a lot on the lists, I am mapping a bit, I have written some software, and I am on the data working group. Actually, the good thing of making in some way a job out of your hobby enables you to do that. And for me, as just

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license for business: meh

2010-08-22 Thread Nic Roets
Declaring conflicts of interest is pretty standard procedure. And Anthony, if you decide that your are only concerned with the license, then this email is not for you. But if we are like Wikipedia (who forked over the advertising issue), we will look for conflict on interest beyond the licensing d

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license for business: meh

2010-08-22 Thread Anthony
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Nic Roets wrote: > I can't speak for Chris, but you [Frederik] don't make me nervous because > you're quite > open and you don't drive any issues that may have business implications. He doesn't make me nervous, but I wouldn't want him (or anyone else) to have any

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license for business: meh

2010-08-22 Thread Nic Roets
I can't speak for Chris, but you don't make me nervous because you're quite open and you don't drive any issues that may have business implications. On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sort of sick of allegations that what I say and do in the community > is some

[OSM-legal-talk] New license for business: meh

2010-08-22 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, I'm sort of sick of allegations that what I say and do in the community is somehow tainted by myself doing business in OSM. Here's a quote from talk a while ago: Chris Browet wrote: The fact that many key players (SteveC, Frederik, Richard(?)) in the project also have commercial inter