Thanks for clarifying, I glossed over the implications of the attribution
requirement a little too easily.
--
Martijn
On 8/8/14, 2:48 AM, "Simon Poole" wrote:
>
>
>Am 05.08.2014 20:25, schrieb Martijn van Exel:
>...
>>
>> Note that YouTube users can also choose a CC-BY license - which shou
2014-08-08 18:35 GMT+02:00 Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com>:
> Getting a bit off-topic, but it seems quite a few people don't realise
> this about CC-By (and also some other 'open' licences). I think it
> would be a really good idea if there could be some sort of offi
On 8 August 2014 09:48, Simon Poole wrote:
> CC-BY is not per se compatible. We need (and I believe this is still the
> case with 4.0) explicit acknowledgement that the way that we provide
> attribution is OK and that we do not provide downstream attribution for
> individual sources.
Getting a bi
Am 05.08.2014 20:25, schrieb Martijn van Exel:
...
>
> Note that YouTube users can also choose a CC-BY license - which should
> be compatible with ODbL. But the default is the Standard YouTube License
> outlined above.
...
CC-BY is not per se compatible. We need (and I believe this is still the
:a...@mapbox.com>
> Reply: Licensing and other legal discussions.
> > <mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
> Date: August 7, 2014 at 11:11:31 AM
> To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
> > <mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-tal
> Am 08/ago/2014 um 00:39 schrieb Martijn van Exel :
>
> I’m having someone look into it - worthwhile if you see how many road geeks
> post lengthy drive videos on YouTube.
> Stuff like this —> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUWolPiisu4 an
Looks like the author of this could potentially be in
atch?v=BfE9xUH3wGk
--
Martijn van Exel
From: Alex Barth
Reply: Licensing and other legal discussions. >
Date: August 7, 2014 at 11:11:31 AM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. >
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] YouTube videos
I've in the past used information from Youtube videos in ra
I've in the past used information from Youtube videos in rare instances.
For example to confirm the surface quality of a road. Facts aren't
copyrightable. I'd love to hear a more qualified person's opinion though.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone
Hi all,
Has anyone ever looked into the legal aspects of using YouTube videos to derive
information from? Do any general rules apply?
An example of a potentially useful video would be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH99jVtb1eg&feature=youtu.be - I see that the
Standard YouTube License is app
