Tiberiu-Cezar,
This isn't really my topic but you've made your point (repeatedly).
Respectfully, please don't fill my inbox to say the same thing over and
over when people disagree and when numerous people have asked you to stop
and to drop them from discussions.
Eric
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:
(I forgot to reply to all lists… Sorry.)
It seems the problem is the meaning of “libre” in terms of unreleased
hardware/software. EOMA68 certainly is aligned with libre culture and
significant for freedom because of its modularity standard. It also is
GPL-compliant like any unreleased product, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey libre lovers,
Just wanted to share a precious moment from LibreCon 2016:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cqz625FXYAAZVhD.jpg
- --
Logan Streondj,
A dream of Gaia's future.
blog: http://joyfullifestyle.ca
twitter: https://twitter.com/streondj
Spe
On 26.08.2016 23:03, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> I have to disagree here. Comparing this to GPL violation is outrageous.
You might be right and the parallelism I made is too extrapolated.
Thanks for noting that.
Tiberiu
Ali, thanks for your arguments. Schematics don't make a hardware
free-design hardware, as PaulK has stated and as Richard's essay
explains. It's the PCB design sources. Schematics are usually PDF files.
I doubt any of the people who now hold the EOMA68-A20 computer boards
would disobey the project
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:26:42PM +0300, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
> On 26.08.2016 21:48, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> > and *not a problem* if all available sources
> > will eventually be released.
>
> Well, if it's not true that said hardware is libre hardware now (or
> since "the v
On 26.08.2016 22:47, Eric Schultz wrote:
> This isn't really my topic but you've made your point (repeatedly).
> Respectfully, please don't fill my inbox to say the same thing over and
> over when people disagree and when numerous people have asked you to
> stop and to drop them from discussions.
On 26.08.2016 19:05, Josh Branning wrote:
> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic
>
> Maybe they /do/ intend to release the CAD files when they say they will.
> In which case, has it occurred to you that the kind of things you are
> saying:
>
> A) May look a bit silly once (and if) they're released.
They have
Hi all,
I’m not even sure that it’s imprecise to say that it is “free from the very
beginning.” However, since my reasoning may be wrong, let me write it below and
you folk can point out my mistakes.
To quote Christopher: “Everybody who has the devices has the schematics and
rights thereof.” S
Actually, forwarding yourself is better than cross-posting by fsf IMHO.
Forwarding allows everyone to start a conversation thread with a line of
thinking. Cross-posting would be having only one thread with multiple lines
of thinking all tangled up (something that will happen anyways, ok).
On Fri,
On 26.08.2016 21:48, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> It seems the problem is the meaning of “libre” in terms of unreleased
> hardware/software. EOMA68 certainly is aligned with libre culture and
> significant for freedom because of its modularity standard. It also is
> GPL-compliant like any un
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:45:59 +0200, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> So I'd like to suggest that the FSF cross-post their announcements to
> libreplanet-discuss. There's not a lot of them, so it wouldn't be a
> mess. And it would give us all a place to discuss announcements, as
> well as give the FS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey libre lovers, great news!
EOMA68 has reached its funding target :-D.
It's time to laugh, dance, jump and be merry.
Just remember to keep the money for only project purposes.
Can meditate on the beauty of this moment,
where an RYF libre hardwar
On 26.08.2016 19:27, Ali Razeen wrote:
> I follow your argument but to make sure we’re on the same page, let me try to
> rephrase it in my own words so that you can agree or disagree. I believe you
> claim that we cannot say that the EOMA68 is “libre hardware from the
> beginning” because we hav
(Removed John Sullivan from the CC list because I’m sure he gets this email via
libreplanet-discuss and doesn’t need (want?) me to address him directly :))
I follow your argument but to make sure we’re on the same page, let me try to
rephrase it in my own words so that you can agree or disagree.
Thank you, Ali. I really appreciate you taking the time to answer my
call and share your opinion on the libreplanet-discuss mailing list.
On 26.08.2016 16:28, Ali Razeen wrote:
> If this is true in the libre hardware world,
I follow your logic, but I'm not sure there is an exact analogy libre
sof
My first attempt was to discuss and suggest better wordings for both
older and upcoming publications. I didn't intend to make accusations and
such.
This is why I sent several messages here suggesting both "parties" of
the discussion to simply analise the issue and, if needed, correct not
only the
Hi Tiberiu-Cezar,
I am only a libre software/hardware user and a backer of EOMA.
> On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:30 AM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>
> On 26.08.2016 12:46, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
>> Le jeudi 25 août 2016 à 23:22 -0400, John Sullivan a écrit :
>>> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes:
>
On 26.08.2016 12:46, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le jeudi 25 août 2016 à 23:22 -0400, John Sullivan a écrit :
>> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes:
>> Below are more attempts of ThinkPenguin to brainwash people.
>>
>> This stops now on this list. ThinkPenguin is not deliberately attempting
>> to brain
Le jeudi 25 août 2016 à 23:22 -0400, John Sullivan a écrit :
> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes:
> Below are more attempts of ThinkPenguin to brainwash people.
>
> This stops now on this list. ThinkPenguin is not deliberately attempting
> to brainwash anyone, and we won't tolerate accusations of ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Sometimes the FSF announces something, and I have a comment or
question, but there's no clear channel for facilitating discussion on
announcements.
So I'd like to suggest that the FSF cross-post their announcements to
libreplanet-discuss. There's no
21 matches
Mail list logo
