do you have email addresses for massachusetts institute of technology wifi
802.11 researchers?
Or how I can find such researchers? It is about
if mit can contribute to the openwifi card.
https://github.com/open-sdr/openwifi
___
libreplanet-discuss maili
> It's clear that the original poster is very passionate.
It is impertinent how purism has abused people's lack
of knowledge about how intel cpus require
non free software to work.
>
> * Core Issue : Purism is selling and marketing products as if they did not
> contain proprietary software when
> Purism is a company, if you have a problem with that company, complain
> to that.
Read the initial post. The message is directed at fsf and
libreplanet officials. Others answered and I decided not
to ignore their posts. I responded. About purism, they
know because they have been told. Posting
> I agree about liying or misleading. Without ethics nothing works. I am
> talking in general not specific case.
It is shameless how purism
has deceived people.
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libr
On 3/15/20 3:28 PM, Félicien Pillot wrote:
>
> We are not speaking about software here, are we?
Yes, we are. The software which runs the cpu is
also software.
>
> The computer is actually working with 100% free _software_, including
> drivers and kernel, but it does contain nonfree _firmware_ (B
>>In my opinion moving in one step from all closed source to all open
>>source freedom respecting is very hard or practically impossible. I am
>>happy people are doing steps towards all open source and no hidden
>>stuff. One valid step is modern hardware running open source Operat
On 3/14/20 11:09 AM, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> On 3/12/20 9:56 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
>> Félicien Pillot, 11/03/20 23:05:
>>> What's wrong??
>> ninhar has raised such topics earlier in the Replicant mailing list,
>> see for instance:
&g
gives him an opertunity to give a
talk. If purism gives the speech and is not confronted with his lies
then he can use the video to deceive more people. They trust me dumb ...
If he gives the speech and is confronted then I have nothing against him
giving the speech.
>
> Thanks
>
> On
On 3/14/20 11:04 AM, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> On 3/11/20 11:10 PM, Lori Nagel via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>>I'm not really sure how Purism is any worse than companies like Think
>>Penguin, or than the machines are any less freedom respecting
No. You are
On 3/12/20 9:56 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Félicien Pillot, 11/03/20 23:05:
>> What's wrong??
>
> ninhar has raised such topics earlier in the Replicant mailing list,
> see for instance:
> https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/replicant/2019-November/002268.html
>
> "Report from 36C3" is AFAIC
On 3/12/20 6:43 AM, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 20:10:09 +0100, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
>> and fsf.
>>
>> I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
>> http
I resend the emails replying to purism why does fsf and libreboot
embrace a misleading company? under the
subject purism why does fsf and libreplanet embrace a misleading company?
That seemed not to work. This is a test email.
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
ps and
>laptops. (with the exception of some old ones such as the refurbished
>ThinkPads like the t400)
>
>On Wednesday, March 11, 2020, 3:12:10 PM EDT, a via libreplanet-discuss
> wrote:
>This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
>and fsf.
>
On 3/11/20 9:11 PM, Stanisława Pałętka wrote:
> W dniu środa, 11 marca 2020 a via libreplanet-discuss <
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> napisał(a):
>
>> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
>> and fsf.
>>
>> I wrote this post on trisqu
On 3/12/20 5:25 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 2020-03-11 14:33, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>> My post is about getting official comments from
>> libreplanet and fsf. Of course anybody can
>> reply, but I already know how people attempt
>> to defend purism's be
On 3/12/20 5:25 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 2020-03-11 14:33, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>> My post is about getting official comments from
>> libreplanet and fsf. Of course anybody can
>> reply, but I already know how people attempt
>> to defend purism's be
the exception of some old ones such as the
> refurbished
> ThinkPads like the t400)
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2020, 3:12:10 PM EDT, a via
> libreplanet-discuss
> <[2]libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> wrote:
> This post is directed
On 3/11/20 9:11 PM, Stanisława Pałętka wrote:
> W dniu środa, 11 marca 2020 a via libreplanet-discuss <
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> napisał(a):
>
>> This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
>> and fsf.
>>
>> I wrote this post on trisqu
On 3/11/20 10:58 PM, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
>> If I understand correctly...
>>
>> First, you criticise Purism for saying that soon they would be supported
>> by the FSF.
>> Then, you criticise the FSF for having supported Purism soon after that.
>>
&g
On 3/11/20 10:33 PM, a via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> My post is about getting official comments from
> libreplanet and fsf. Of course anybody can
> reply, but I already know how people attempt
> to defend purism's behavior.
>
>
> On 3/11/20 8:48 PM, Aaron Wolf wro
enerate the
> strongest argument you can for a defense of Purism and FSF, and then see
> if that holds up to scrutiny. That's much more insightful than
> generating weak or straw-man arguments or speculative suspicions.
>
> On 2020-03-11 12:10, a via libreplanet-discuss wr
This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
and fsf.
I wrote this post on trisquel's forum. Also available on
https://paste.nolsen.xyz/?98e7462461e8a46c#8YchW86Fn3UvkxdHbfN74cVVoYkFqCGWCx2tWVX5uvZJ
https://libreplanet.org/2020/speakers/#2464
https://www.fsf.org/givingguide/v10/
https://tri
I got aware, I have made a big mistake. The subject
should have said
purism why does fsf and libreplanet embrace
misleading company?
I will restart my post having the correct subject
and a couple of adjustments in the text.
People can then resend their responses to the
new post.
Can they posts I
> If I understand correctly...
>
> First, you criticise Purism for saying that soon they would be supported
> by the FSF.
> Then, you criticise the FSF for having supported Purism soon after that.
>
> What's wrong??
I am criticizing purism for fraudulent behavior. I say purism
is using fsf in pur
My post is about getting official comments from
libreplanet and fsf. Of course anybody can
reply, but I already know how people attempt
to defend purism's behavior.
On 3/11/20 8:48 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, you believe: Purism marketing talks about
> software freedom
This post is directed at officials from libreplanet
and fsf.
I wrote this post on trisquel's forum.
https://paste.nolsen.xyz/?98e7462461e8a46c#8YchW86Fn3UvkxdHbfN74cVVoYkFqCGWCx2tWVX5uvZJ
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
libreplanet-di
26 matches
Mail list logo
