Le 4 décembre 2017 20:02:41 GMT+01:00, Chad Larson
a écrit :
>On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:06:10AM -0600, Caleb Herbert wrote:
>> On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 21:12 -0500, Chad Larson wrote:
[...]
>> > that the code implements the requirements correctly
>for each
>> > product that uses the code. Industri
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:06:10AM -0600, Caleb Herbert wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 21:12 -0500, Chad Larson wrote:
> > Merely using a VCS is not sufficient. Traceability requires identifying
> > individual persons responsible for determining requirements for the
> > code, establishing their co
If the original misinformation article website weren't forcing non-free
client-side software through JS I would vote for mentioning Michael
Pagan's reply there.
Also, I have some points to add to Michael Pagan's reply:
I agree with the bias of "intellectual property", also see the comments
I made
On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 21:12 -0500, Chad Larson wrote:
> Merely using a VCS is not sufficient. Traceability requires identifying
> individual persons responsible for determining requirements for the
> code, establishing their competence to design and implement the code, and
> demonstrating that the
Le 4 décembre 2017 03:12:55 GMT+01:00, Chad Larson
a écrit :
[...]
>> * Reason #1 – Lacks a traceable software development life cycle
>>
>In embedded project context, "traceability" refers to a matrix
>of requirements on the integrated product (e.g. "must implement
[...]
>Merely using a VCS is n
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 02:22:08PM -0500, Michael Pagan wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2017 at 23:45, Mary-Anne Wolf wrote:
> > This
> > https://www.designnews.com/content/7-reasons-open-source-software-should-be-avoided/100858102757881
> > says, "As much potential as open source software can provide, there
>
On 2 Dec 2017 at 23:45, Mary-Anne Wolf wrote:
> This
> https://www.designnews.com/content/7-reasons-open-source-software-should-be-avoided/100858102757881
> says, "As much potential as open source software can provide, there
> are several reasons why embedded software developers should avoid it
>
I tried to post a comment, however a spam filter blocked my response.
My reaction was:
"
So, if Open Source or Free Software does not comply quality standards,
according to your 'investigation', what will?
Closed Software?
Anyone is able to verify quality and integrity of Open/Free software. In
7 half baked fallacies to push some of @Jacob_Beningo's legacy ideas into the
IoT market, break stuff and lock the market with abusive IP.
It's a paid hit piece. If this tactic weren't profitable, freedom haters
wouldn't use it. Free software scares them.
___
Le 3 décembre 2017 05:45:12 GMT+01:00, Mary-Anne Wolf a
écrit :
>This
>https://www.designnews.com/content/7-reasons-open-source-software-should-be-avoided/100858102757881
>says, "As much potential as open source software can provide, there are
>several reasons why embedded software developers sho
El 3 de diciembre de 2017 04:45:12 GMT+00:00, Mary-Anne Wolf
>Actually, a first person already has, but maybe more than one person
>should.
>
>
Actually I would say less is more. The answer is short and to the point, if I
answer I would probably sound like a troll. Plus, it will give it more w
This
https://www.designnews.com/content/7-reasons-open-source-software-should-be-avoided/100858102757881
says, "As much potential as open source software can provide, there are
several reasons why embedded software developers should avoid it like the
plague."
You would not be surprised that t
12 matches
Mail list logo
