I guess you do not understand the difference between promoting open
source and promoting free software. Neither do you understand the
implications of that. I suggest you re-read the mails that preceed mine
on this thread. I have one more link for you:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-miss
On 31/01/13 14:18, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> Why didn't I named it "Free Software" ?
> I could put a GNU logo (that GNU cow)... but it has implications, like
> from any brand:
> Users will start asking for Debian-like freedom or higher standard,
> which I cannot provide.
>
It is mainly about what
>> by providing collection of such software on a single disc, plus
>> providing video (such as the Revolution O.S. trailer, in WebM
>> format) and open-source books (The cathedral and the bazaar and others).
>How does any of this promote free software? It promotes a bunch of
>programs, films and b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander nails it. It is good - but could do much better in terms of
advocating free software.
In my eyes it starts with the prominent OPEN SOURCE (tm) logo.
Since you posted here on libreplanet you're kind of asking for this link:
https://www.gnu.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/01/13 12:10, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> The Qumble projects intends to teach Windows users the advantages
> of Free and Open-Source software
The goals in terms of advantages of open source and free software are
radically different. Open source pr
Hello,
The Qumble projects intends to teach Windows users the advantages of
Free and Open-Source software, by providing collection of such
software on a single disc, plus providing video (such as the
Revolution O.S. trailer, in WebM format) and open-source books (The
cathedral and the bazaar and o
