Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Clarification regarding licensing under the GPL v3

2012-07-24 Thread John Sullivan
Jamalulkhair Bin Khairedin writes: > Hi John, > > I've sent emails on the 3rd, 9th and 18th of July to licens...@fsf.org. > >From which address? > But nevermind. I already received reply form Joshua Gay today responding to > this mailing list post. The answer is sufficient for our need. > I'

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Clarification regarding licensing under the GPL v3

2012-07-24 Thread Jamalulkhair Bin Khairedin
Hi John, I've sent emails on the 3rd, 9th and 18th of July to licens...@fsf.org. But nevermind. I already received reply form Joshua Gay today responding to this mailing list post. The answer is sufficient for our need. Thank you so much On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:24:06 -0400, John Sullivan wrote

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Clarification regarding licensing under the GPL v3

2012-07-24 Thread John Sullivan
Jamalulkhair Bin Khairedin writes: > Dear Libreplanet Members, > > I have sent enquiries to the Free Software Foundation, Inc > (licens...@gnu.org > & g...@gnu.org) but did not get any reply. So, I have to ask here instead. > What we need is a clarification regarding GPLv3. > Can I ask

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Clarification regarding licensing under the GPL v3

2012-07-24 Thread Ramana Kumar
I trust the FSF will answer you soon! I'll write something just so you have a quick reply, but I am not a lawyer and I'm not sure I am correct. I am not a lawyer, but I believe the answer is (b), you do not need to have any patents registered or any plans to. The purpose of item 11 seems to me to

[libreplanet-discuss] Clarification regarding licensing under the GPL v3

2012-07-23 Thread Jamalulkhair Bin Khairedin
Dear Libreplanet Members, I have sent enquiries to the Free Software Foundation, Inc (licens...@gnu.org & g...@gnu.org) but did not get any reply. So, I have to ask here instead. What we need is a clarification regarding GPLv3. We in the process releasing a software module as an open so