On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 12:19 -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> >
> > Practice Rapaport's Rules here and everywhere:
> >
> > “First, you must attempt to re-express your opponent’s position so
> > clearly, vividly, and fairly that your opponent says, ‘Thanks, I wish
> > I’d thought of putting it that way.’
On 02/27/2016 08:23 PM, Harsh Gupta wrote:
>
> As a current student in India, I feel this point is very valid.
> We have a clean slate out here, not only in terms of opinions of
> developers but also in terms of users and bureaucracy. Our
> bureaucracy is willing of listen to the voices of the peop
> I know I've suggested this before and then failed to act on it (for
> lack of time) but I think it would be good to enumerate/categorize
> each of these common fallacious critiques of the GPL on the
> libreplanet wiki, one per page, so they can be easily responded to,
> and our best responses can
Hi. Thanks to Fabio for initiating this thread.
On 27/02/2016 22:46, Michael Lamb wrote:
> I apologize that I turned this into a disorganized ramble.
+1 for the disorganized ramble.
In particular, I also have mixed feelings about @nayafia's polemic. It
would be good to see a reasoned analysis f
(Sorry for the duplicate message Fabio, re-posting to the list.)
I've experienced similar frustration talking with people about the GPL.
The most frustrating responses are when I talk with GPL-haters who I
know and respect as developers, who are otherwise nice and care for
others, and whose other
> There are hundreds of thousands of young developers around the world
> today, especially in places like India and China, who are still forming
> their own opinions about what is right and wrong.
As a current student in India, I feel this point is very valid. We have a clean
slate out here, not o
On 02/27/2016 12:40 PM, Yui Hirasawa wrote:
>> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
>> "viral".
>
> Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should
> be allowed to kill.
It's very unfortunate you'd think this way. I too fin
> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
> "viral".
Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should
be allowed to kill.
>>>
>>> It's very unfortunate you'd think this way. I too find the GPL
>>> restricts some freedom, but understan
On 02/27/2016 12:16 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 12:09 PM, Yui Hirasawa wrote:
> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
> "viral".
Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should
be allowed to kill.
>>>
>>> It's very unfort
On 27/02/16 20:43, klez wrote:
>
>
> Il 27 febbraio 2016 19:09:41 CET, Yui Hirasawa ha scritto:
>>> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
>> "viral".
>>
>> Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should be
>> allowed to kill.
>
> It's very unfortu
On 02/27/2016 12:09 PM, Yui Hirasawa wrote:
Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
"viral".
>>>
>>> Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should
>>> be allowed to kill.
>>
>> It's very unfortunate you'd think this way. I too find the GPL
>> r
Yui Hirasawa writes:
Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
"viral".
>>>
>>> Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should
>>> be allowed to kill.
>>
>> It's very unfortunate you'd think this way. I too find the GPL
>> restricts some freedom
>>> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
>>> "viral".
>>
>> Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should
>> be allowed to kill.
>
> It's very unfortunate you'd think this way. I too find the GPL
> restricts some freedom, but understand the need for i
klez writes:
> Il 27 febbraio 2016 19:09:41 CET, Yui Hirasawa ha scritto:
>>> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
>>"viral".
>>
>>Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should be
>>allowed to kill.
>
> It's very unfortunate you'd think this way. I
Il 27 febbraio 2016 19:09:41 CET, Yui Hirasawa ha scritto:
>> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and
>"viral".
>
>Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should be
>allowed to kill.
It's very unfortunate you'd think this way. I too find the GPL restr
On 02/27/2016 10:48 AM, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote:
> El 27 de febrero de 2016 17:27:51 GMT+00:00, Aaron Wolf
> escribió:
>> On 02/27/2016 04:44 AM, Fabio Pesari wrote:
>>> Many people (especially in the open source community) hate the GPL
>> more
>>> than they hate proprietary software, especia
El 27 de febrero de 2016 17:27:51 GMT+00:00, Aaron Wolf
escribió:
>On 02/27/2016 04:44 AM, Fabio Pesari wrote:
>> Many people (especially in the open source community) hate the GPL
>more
>> than they hate proprietary software, especially the GPLv3. I never
>found
>> an approach that works with th
On 27/02/16 12:27 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 02/27/2016 04:44 AM, Fabio Pesari wrote:
>> Many people (especially in the open source community) hate the GPL more
>> than they hate proprietary software, especially the GPLv3. I never found
>> an approach that works with those people.
>>
>> Mention "fr
On 02/27/2016 10:09 AM, Yui Hirasawa wrote:
> Many people who think that are anarchist who also think they should be
> allowed to kill.
>
I don't think Anarchists say that people should be allowed to kill.
Unrelated to that, I think the vast majority of people who say GPL is
"viral" and "restric
> Many people (especially in the open source community) hate the GPL more
> than they hate proprietary software, especially the GPLv3. I never found
> an approach that works with those people.
I find BSD people to be the loudest about this. The "open source" people
don't seem to give two shits as
On 02/27/2016 04:44 AM, Fabio Pesari wrote:
> Many people (especially in the open source community) hate the GPL more
> than they hate proprietary software, especially the GPLv3. I never found
> an approach that works with those people.
>
> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive
On 27/02/16 13:44, Fabio Pesari wrote:
> Many people (especially in the open source community) hate the GPL more
> than they hate proprietary software, especially the GPLv3. I never found
> an approach that works with those people.
>
> Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" a
Many people (especially in the open source community) hate the GPL more
than they hate proprietary software, especially the GPLv3. I never found
an approach that works with those people.
Mention "freedom" and they'll say the GPL is "restrictive" and "viral".
Mention practical advantages and they'
23 matches
Mail list logo
