On 27/01/14 05:38, David Loyall wrote:
> Adam, thank you. Somehow I'd failed to notice that the package is in
> Debian's 'non-free' section when I googled up the package page.
> Pardon me!
No worries. I'm a fan of the DXX-Rebirth project too (sent the lead dev
a postcard a while back - he collect
Adam, thank you. Somehow I'd failed to notice that the package is in
Debian's 'non-free' section when I googled up the package page.
Pardon me!
Question: does do Debian packages in their "main" repository always
meet the FSF guidelines?
Thanks,
--Dave
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Adam Bolte
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:47:38AM -0600, David Loyall wrote:
> There was this non-free game for PC called Descent, back in the mid
> nineties. (It wasn't called a non-free game back then, it was just
> called a cool game!) At some point, the source was re-licensed as
> free software, but not the
Hello.
NB I am not familiar with the details of the TurboCASH situation so my
commentary is based only on the content of the wikipedia page and my
own experience with small, windows-only software that has migrated to
free licenses.
Sounds like TurboCASH just needs time and patches. The developer
El dom 19 ene 2014 00:17:21 ECT, Mike Gerwitz escribió:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:07:27AM -0500, Quiliro Ordóñez Baca wrote:
>> What do you think about this?
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TurboCASH#Criticism
>
> There is unfortunately no reference describing the situation; could you
> su
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:07:27AM -0500, Quiliro Ordóñez Baca wrote:
> What do you think about this?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TurboCASH#Criticism
There is unfortunately no reference describing the situation; could you
summarize it for us and maybe provide some details about the environm
What do you think about this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TurboCASH#Criticism
--
Saludos libres,
Quiliro Ordóñez
600 8579
