Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-04 Thread al3xu5 / dotcommon
Il giorno lunedì 03/12/2012 21:06:03 CET Alexey Eromenko ha scritto: > >Unfortunately, being a google doc, I cannot read it. > > Here I have uploaded an OpenDocument Text, attached, for those that > can't read Google docs :) Good :) I have read it. And I mostly agree with you. But, unfortunat

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-03 Thread Alexey Eromenko
>Unfortunately, being a google doc, I cannot read it. Here I have uploaded an OpenDocument Text, attached, for those that can't read Google docs :) Why_I_consider_cloud-dependent_packages_as_non-free_software.odt Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-03 Thread al3xu5 / dotcommon
Il giorno lunedì 03/12/2012 22:41:16 CET "r. siddharth" ha scritto: > If you're looking at a blogging service that pays heed to your privacy > and which makes it easy to publish you work. I think, noblogs.org[1] > should satisfy your needs. Yes, it should indeed. Just be sure to meet their pol

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-03 Thread r. siddharth
On Sunday 02 December 2012 09:21 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote: I have little time, so "establishing" will likely not happen anytime soon. If there is something super-easy, then yes, I may consider moving, else it will have to wait. What do you think about WordPress? Is it a free and good publish

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-03 Thread al3xu5 / dotcommon
Il giorno domenica 02/12/2012 11:19:25 CET Alexey Eromenko ha scritto: > Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ? > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bHZtaaghFay-rWc_g-soQ2loe-WtUSXZFy2HPY87djU/edit Unfortunately, being a google doc, I cannot read it. A -- al3xu5 / dot

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread r. siddharth
On Sunday 02 December 2012 09:21 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote: What do you think about WordPress? Is it a free and good publishing platform? Well, WordPress is free software[1]. WordPress.com is a commercial service run by Automattic[2], which uses WordPress. Gratis accounts at WordPress.com w

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak
Dnia niedziela, 2 grudnia 2012 o 16:51:47 Alexey Eromenko napisał(a): > What do you think about WordPress? Is it a free and good publishing > platform? Wordpress the software is a decent blogging engine. Wordpress.com the hosting - not really sure. If you're up for one article, then - as pointed

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread Alexey Eromenko
What do you think about WordPress? Is it a free and good publishing platform?

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread Michael Mehrazar
On 12/02/2012 07:24 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote: > > I have little time, so "establishing" will likely not happen anytime > soon. If there is something super-easy, then yes, I may consider > moving, else it will have to wait. > Have you considered setting up an "etherpad"? (https://en.wikipedia.or

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread Thomas Harding
Le 02/12/2012 13:24, Alexey Eromenko a écrit : On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote: The easiest solution, I guess, would be to set-up a Friendica/Diaspora account on one of the pods/servers and publish there - it's decentralised and federated, and hence next to uncens

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread Alexey Eromenko
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote: > > > The easiest solution, I guess, would be to set-up a Friendica/Diaspora > account on one of the pods/servers and publish there - it's > decentralised and federated, and hence next to uncensorable. I have little time, so "establis

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak
Dnia niedziela, 2 grudnia 2012 o 11:51:13 Alexey Eromenko napisał(a): > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak > > wrote: > > Dnia niedziela, 2 grudnia 2012 o 10:19:25 Alexey Eromenko napisał(a): > >> Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ? > >> https://d

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread Alexey Eromenko
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote: > Dnia niedziela, 2 grudnia 2012 o 10:19:25 Alexey Eromenko napisał(a): >> Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ? >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bHZtaaghFay-rWc_g-soQ2loe-WtUSX >> ZFy2HPY87djU/edit > >

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ?

2012-12-02 Thread Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak
Dnia niedziela, 2 grudnia 2012 o 10:19:25 Alexey Eromenko napisał(a): > Why I consider cloud-dependent packages as non-free software ? > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bHZtaaghFay-rWc_g-soQ2loe-WtUSX > ZFy2HPY87djU/edit Good point. But I am somewhat surprised (in a bad way) by the fact that