Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-04 Thread Will Hill
Software owners might interpret their violation of freedom 0 as an excuse to violate your privacy. Microsoft's TOS for Vista and later demands the ability to inspect and delete your files for licensing, law enforcement, and to protect the safety of Microsoft employees. If some of the software

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-02 Thread Andrew A. Adams
> Can you give an example of software that doesn't respect freedom 0? > ("The freedom to run the program, for any purpose") Yet another example. Mots computer science departments at Universities have proprietary development systems such as MS Visual Studio. The academic license is much cheaper (

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-02 Thread Nicolás Reynolds
Yoni Rabkin writes: > mtsio writes: > >> Can they really check for what purpose do you use them? I mean, do these >> programs have anti-features that prevent you from using them for any >> purpose? > > Yes, there are such anti-features, but that is irrelevant to the > original question since mos

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-02 Thread Yoni Rabkin
mtsio writes: > Can they really check for what purpose do you use them? I mean, do these > programs have anti-features that prevent you from using them for any > purpose? Yes, there are such anti-features, but that is irrelevant to the original question since most of the terms of a typical soft

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-02 Thread mtsio
Can they really check for what purpose do you use them? I mean, do these programs have anti-features that prevent you from using them for any purpose? Yoni Rabkin: > >> Hey, >> >> Can you give an example of software that doesn't respect freedom 0? >> ("The freedom to run the program, for any purp

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-01 Thread brendanpmurray
Have a look at Apple's licence at https://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/MacOSX.htm, in particular section 2.B. That basically says that if you use their "Open source" you may make one copy only and that must run on an Apple computer. Of course, all their proprietary software may only run on App

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-01 Thread Thomas HARDING
On 01/06/2015 19:43, klez wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Most proprietary software made in the US forbids its use for military purpose, or if you are a citizen of a "foe" country (North Korea, Cuba, Iran and others, IIRC). See the end of this[0] (section g) for example.

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-01 Thread Yoni Rabkin
> Hey, > > Can you give an example of software that doesn't respect freedom 0? > ("The freedom to run the program, for any purpose") For instance, if you purchase the "student edition" of the bureaucracy suit Microsoft sells you will not be allowed to run it for "commercial, nonprofit, or revenue

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-01 Thread klez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Most proprietary software made in the US forbids its use for military purpose, or if you are a citizen of a "foe" country (North Korea, Cuba, Iran and others, IIRC). See the end of this[0] (section g) for example. [0] https://www.apple.com/legal/int

[libreplanet-discuss] freedom #0

2015-06-01 Thread mtsio
Hey, Can you give an example of software that doesn't respect freedom 0? ("The freedom to run the program, for any purpose")