"J.B. Nicholson" wrote:
> John Sullivan wrote:
> > I'm not aware of any, but I think that's a good idea, since I've seen
> > the same conversation many times too. The libreplanet.org wiki could be
> > a good place for it?
>
> I see that https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists_vs._Discourse_For
"J.B. Nicholson" writes:
> John Sullivan wrote:
>> I'm not aware of any, but I think that's a good idea, since I've seen
>> the same conversation many times too. The libreplanet.org wiki could be
>> a good place for it?
>
> I see that
> https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists_vs._Discourse_For
U'll Be King Of The Stars wrote:
Usenet was one of my favorite things about the internet. I would love
for it to be revived.
Usenet is still around and working quite well. Usenet might not be as
popular as it once was but it's not dead. In fact, I'd say that the
principled response to hostin
Michael Downey wrote:
Again, Mozilla is self hosting their Discourse installation.
No idea why you think otherwise.
Apparently I was mistaken, I had understood that the Discourse software was
making reference to items under the control of discourse.org keeping
discourse.org in some control o
Again, Mozilla is self hosting their Discourse installation.
No idea why you think otherwise.
Michael
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https
Michael Downey wrote:
Blaming the Discourse software project ("discourse.org") for the
capacity Mozilla did or didn't build out for their forum would be like
blaming Automattic (builders of WordPress) for my project's site outage
during LibrePlanet that year. It's neither accurate nor fair.
Are
On 04/05/2019 14:22, Sudarshan S Chawathe wrote:
> It may be interesting to consider also an architecture like USENET/NNTP
> in this context. It is not without flaws, but it admits some additional
> options in highly-loaded situations, such as prioritizing pushing of
> articles to peer servers ove
rom: Michael Downey
> To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 05:19:57 -0700
> Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] resources about mailing lists vs. forums
> (e.g. Discourse)
>
> [...]
>
> So there is, in fact, parity to something like mailman w
On examination, this argument doesn't hold up. Read on to learn why.
On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 02:13 -0500, J.B. Nicholson wrote:
> Current situation: Mozilla has a discourse.org forum to discuss this
> (
> https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/certificate-issue-causing-add-ons-to-be-disabled-or-fail-to-in
John Sullivan wrote:
I'm not aware of any, but I think that's a good idea, since I've seen
the same conversation many times too. The libreplanet.org wiki could be
a good place for it?
I see that https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists_vs._Discourse_Forum
now points only to https://en.wikipe
Thomas Harding writes:
> Le 5 août 2017 21:21:18 GMT+02:00, John Sullivan a écrit :
>> Daniel Pocock writes:
>>
>> > I've seen various communities having debates about whether to adopt
>> > Discourse of similar forum software instead of a mailing list.
>> >
>> > Has anybody already prepared an
Le 5 août 2017 21:21:18 GMT+02:00, John Sullivan a écrit :
> Daniel Pocock writes:
>
> > I've seen various communities having debates about whether to adopt
> > Discourse of similar forum software instead of a mailing list.
> >
> > Has anybody already prepared any objective wiki pages or blogs
Daniel Pocock writes:
> I've seen various communities having debates about whether to adopt
> Discourse of similar forum software instead of a mailing list.
>
> Has anybody already prepared any objective wiki pages or blogs comparing
> mailing lists to forums and itemising each of the issues to b
I've seen various communities having debates about whether to adopt
Discourse of similar forum software instead of a mailing list.
Has anybody already prepared any objective wiki pages or blogs comparing
mailing lists to forums and itemising each of the issues to be considered?
Rather than repe
14 matches
Mail list logo
