Hi everyone.
Em [2021-07-21 qua 05:40:21+0200], Miroslav Rovis escreveu:
> Maybe somebody could notify the moderators about this at the relevant
> email address (Do you Jorge, have it at hand, remember when we had
> some of our emails filtered or whatever, you Cc'ed me and Greg sent us
> where to
* quil...@riseup.net [2021-04-15 05:08]:
> It is sad to see censorship. It shows who is in charge of allowing or
> prohibiting others to read.
I have deleted the page from Internet, it was misunderstanding by
moderator who wish to sharpen moderating
Jean Louis wrote:
> * Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-10-12 11:36]:
>> David wrote:
>> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:11:51 +0300 Dmitry
>> > Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> You replied privately, offlist. Was it intentional? If yes, why: I see
>> >> nothing secret there?
David wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:11:51 +0300 Dmitry
> Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You replied privately, offlist. Was it intentional? If yes, why: I see
>> nothing secret there?
>
> Absolutely yes, and I did so as your mail to me was private.
I’m sure it was not. :-)
>> If
t; On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:47:42 +0300
> >> Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > David wrote:
> >> > > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction
> >> > > IMHO as the very same core points could hav
You replied privately, offlist. Was it intentional? If yes, why: I see
nothing secret there? If no, may I resent it back to the list?
David wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:47:42 +0300
>> Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > David wrote:
>> >
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:10:25 +0100
David wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:47:42 +0300
> Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > David wrote:
> > > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO
> > > as the ver
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:47:42 +0300
Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
> David wrote:
> > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO
> > as the very same core points could have been made in a less
> > excitable manner without po
>wrote:
>> >
>> > David <[2]postmas...@customer-opinions.net> wrote:
>> > > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction
>> IMHO
>> > as the very same core points could have been made in a less
>
gt; wrote:
> > > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO
> > as the very same core points could have been made in a less
> > excitable manner without potential breaching of the above linked
> > guidelines and thus without
n is way newer than that definition.
Online moderation sometimes includes censorship.
Also, you're splitting hairs, censorship is censorship. And this is
censorship.
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 22:05 -0400, Adam Van Ymeren wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:48 PM Dmitry Alexandrov <
El 2019-10-10 21:05, Adam Van Ymeren escribió:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:48 PM Dmitry Alexandrov <[1]321...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
> David <[2]postmas...@customer-opinions.net> wrote:
> > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme re
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:48 PM Dmitry Alexandrov <[1]321...@gmail.com>
wrote:
David <[2]postmas...@customer-opinions.net> wrote:
> Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO
as the very same core points could have been made
David wrote:
> Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO as the very
> same core points could have been made in a less excitable manner without
> potential breaching of the above linked guidelines and thus without
> triggering any negative ac
y list admin eventually becomes tempted to censor things,
>> which free software technology provides the best way to eliminate the
>> risk of censorship?
>>
>> https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/pipermail/discussion/2019-May/00.html
>>
>
> Yes, and this resulted in e
uires the list address in the To
>header) or because of some moderation policies or because some people
>are censored? Can FSF tell us if any people are currently censored on
>this list and if so, how many?
>
>Some people contacted me given the way I have raised concerns about
>censorsh
e
are censored? Can FSF tell us if any people are currently censored on
this list and if so, how many?
Some people contacted me given the way I have raised concerns about
censorship in other communities recently. A rushed change of the
president appears to be a vulnerable time for any organization.
17 matches
Mail list logo
