Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ian Kelling wrote:
>> Should Mailman convert text/html parts to plain text? Currently this is set
>> to "yes".
>
> Of course, no.
>
>> There's good and bad things about this setting.
>
> There is no good things…
>
>> One bad thing is that gpg signatur
Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> writes:
> Ian Kelling wrote:
>> Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> In short, I propose to refrain from _any_ mangling of messages.
>>
>> I brought up some points, but I don't feel too strongly one way or the
>> other. I think John S is fond
Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> In short, I propose to refrain from _any_ mangling of messages.
I brought up some points, but I don't feel too strongly one way or the
other. I think John S is fond of the footer. Of course we care a lot
what people on this list want, so if people
Ian Kelling wrote:
> Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> In short, I propose to refrain from _any_ mangling of messages.
>
> I brought up some points, but I don't feel too strongly one way or the other.
> I think John S is fond of the footer.
If the reason for a footer to exist is
Ian Kelling wrote:
> Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Well. At least, I hope his list would not be as broken technically as this
>> is used to be: before the last downtime it chucked out HTML parts, so
>> signatures became invalid. When the issue was brought up half a year ago,
Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> writes:
> John Sullivan wrote:
>> I'm sorry about this, everyone. Daniel seems to have done some scraping and
>> compiled a list of addresses on his own, from his libreplanet-discuss
>> archives. This is the list he's encouraging people to BCC.
>
> Well. A
