Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
(4) is_kvm_capable: [Linux] kernel supports kvm? Uses Linux-specific
/dev/kvm
This is really equivalent to the 'is_hvm_capable' check but for KVM.
Just an update on this one for all on the list: We went round several
loops with this, but think we've got a way where
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:38:02AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I'm not so sure about this to be honest. This is very verbose syntax and
> having
> the empty wrapper around every element isn't adding all that much useful
> info in relation to its verbosity.
I based my review on the struc
Daniel Veillard wrote:
The following patch adds 3 configure options to turn on or off
the support for Xen, QEMU/KVM and the test driver, as the output
of configure --help shows:
...
--with-xen add XEN support (on)
--with-qemu add QEMU/KVM support (on)
--with-test
The following patch adds 3 configure options to turn on or off
the support for Xen, QEMU/KVM and the test driver, as the output
of configure --help shows:
...
--with-xen add XEN support (on)
--with-qemu add QEMU/KVM support (on)
--with-test add test driv
VMXON is the instruction which turns on Intel VT extensions[1]. This
instruction can be enabled and disabled by setting a bit in a CPU
register. Moreover, this CPU register itself can be locked so that no
changes can be made until the CPU is power-cycled.
In detail, the register is the IA32_
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:13:10PM +0900, Kazuki Mizushima wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the xm & virsh man page, I make a patch which fixes
> the judgment of the domain state between xenHypervisorDriver and
> xenDaemonDriver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kazuki Mizushima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Okay, it l
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:59:57AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> (1) is_pae_capable: host supports PAE? Uses Linux-specific /proc/cpuinfo
This is also arch specific - only relevant for i386/x86_64.
> (2) is_hvm_capable: host supports HVM & enabled in Xen? Uses
> Xen-specific /sys/hypervisor
Lots of people had various things to say about the first capabilities
patches (see thread starting here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2007-March/msg00153.html).
So I thought I'd try to pull together ideas into a single thread, and
post some information about what this is trying t
Hi Rich,
I think again we're entering into territory where virt-manager and other
clients need to "just know" about the XML format and other quirks of the
particular libvirt driver. That's not a high-level virtualisation API.
I have been thinking about that. OpenVZ is definitely very differen
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:17:37AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> >How important do you guys think having LVM support will be to ET projects?
> >And when will you need it?
>
> For my point of view, as former sysadmin, virtualisation and LVM are
> such a natural fit for
Hi,
According to the xm & virsh man page, I make a patch which fixes
the judgment of the domain state between xenHypervisorDriver and
xenDaemonDriver.
Signed-off-by: Kazuki Mizushima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
Kazuki Mizushima
Index: xend_internal.c
==
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:38:51AM +0530, Shuveb Hussain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> >- os: that's probably one place where OpenVZ may be quite different
> >> >from
> >> > Xen and QEmu, still what does the string
> >> > 'slackware-10.2-i386-minimal'
> >> > mean ? Is that a pointer t
I think again we're entering into territory where virt-manager and other
clients need to "just know" about the XML format and other quirks of the
particular libvirt driver. That's not a high-level virtualisation API.
Long email in preparation on this subject ... I won't spoil your
anticipati
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 07:48:11PM -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 23:22 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
When we build an RPM we also include the default.xml file in the
/etc/libvirt/qemu/networks directory, as well as the autostart symlink.
So a
Jim Meyering wrote:
How important do you guys think having LVM support will be to ET projects?
And when will you need it?
For my point of view, as former sysadmin, virtualisation and LVM are
such a natural fit for each other that I can hardly imagine _not_
provisioning new virtual servers fr
15 matches
Mail list logo