Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
So the question is, is there any meaningful security to be gained by having
the server check the commonName field of the client's certificate against
the client's incoming IP addr whether v4 or v6 ? Perhaps the only thing the
server should be using the client cert's com
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
void
remoteDispatchClientRequest (struct qemud_server *server ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
struct qemud_client *client)
char *args = NULL, *ret = NULL;
Could those two variables instead be void * - to avoid the need to cast
all assignments
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:17:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
3 Client-side
-
A src/remote_internal.c
A src/remote_internal.h
M src/driver.h
M src/libvirt.c
[...]
What sort of info is currently stored in the $sysconfdir/l
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:20:17PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:17:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>(1) remoteOpen and associated, GnuTLS initialisation
> >
> >I've got a question about this comment
> >
> >/* XXX This lo
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:17:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
(1) remoteOpen and associated, GnuTLS initialisation
I've got a question about this comment
/* XXX This loop contains a subtle problem. In the case
* where a host is accessible over
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Historically NULL == 'Xen', so should we just force 'name = Xen' in
src/libvirt.c
and then no internal driver ever has to worry about NULLs in this scenario
again.
Is the plan not to have NULL meaning "get me the most appropriate
connection", sort of in the same way
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:00:49PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
OK so this is step 2.5 out of 8 ... it wasn't part of the original plan.
2.5 Export virGetDomain and virGetNetwork
-
M src/libvirt_sym.version
M src/hash.c
M sr
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:25:00AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
With this analysis in mind, attached is a patch which removes these
three fields (path, flags, xml) and the unused virDomainFlags, with no
apparent ill-effects.
ACK, I'm all for removing code which i
