2009/5/27 Evan Borgstrom
> Hi,
>
> I have a machine running 4 OpenVZ VE's and am looking at libvirt as a
> management tool.
>
> My machine is a Sun Fire X2250 with 1 CPU and 4GB of RAM running Gentoo.
>
> When I start libvirtd the output below appears in the dmesg output and the
> machine continu
Hi,
I have a machine running 4 OpenVZ VE's and am looking at libvirt as a
management tool.
My machine is a Sun Fire X2250 with 1 CPU and 4GB of RAM running Gentoo.
When I start libvirtd the output below appears in the dmesg output and
the machine continues to function for about 30s longer
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:42:47PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Just a simple time-based solution would be sufficient. Right now when
> multiple guests all try to boot at the same time it takes about 4 times
> as long for all of them to boot up as when you boot them individually.
> Apparently to
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:57:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> FWIW this is the libguestfs RPC protocol:
>
> http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/guestfs.3.html#communication_protocol
> http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=src/guestfs_protocol.x;hb=HEAD
>
> It's not direc
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:11:52AM -0400, Thomas Sjolshagen wrote:
Quoting Michael Ansel :
[true|false|1|2|3|..]. style directive in the main XML)? I'd be
interested in putting something together if it is a feasible addition
and someone can point me to the gen
FWIW this is the libguestfs RPC protocol:
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/guestfs.3.html#communication_protocol
http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=src/guestfs_protocol.x;hb=HEAD
It's not directly relevant because at present the server is single-
threaded and answers calls
There are times when you just have to reboot the host machine to clear a
problem or after some maintenance. The problem right now is that this
forces all the guests to go through an entire reboot as well. What
would be good is if the host shutdown would invoke a suspend/hibernate
of the guest
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:11:52AM -0400, Thomas Sjolshagen wrote:
Quoting Michael Ansel :
[true|false|1|2|3|..]. style directive in the main XML)? I'd be
interested in putting something together if it is a feasible addition
and someone can point me to the gen
In addition to Dan's reply, operating systems ought to indicate what
stage they have reached in the boot process (eg. "BIOS up", "kernel
up", "userspace up", "applications started"), perhaps by writing a
status code into a register.
Some PC BIOSes do this already, writing to IO port 0x80, see for
Chris Lalancette wrote:
Gerry Reno wrote:
Gerry Reno wrote:
Gerry Reno wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 03:43:12PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
I upgraded the host from F10 to F11 (x86_64) with no issues. Now when I
start a F10 (i386
Hi,
Probably the easiest way to solve this is to get rid to of the
OpenNebula client library. So we do not have the license issue and, as
Daniel said, we do not have to include the C++ dependencies.
We'll try to send the patch ASAP.
Regards
Ruben
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Daniel P. Ber
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:11:52AM -0400, Thomas Sjolshagen wrote:
>
> Quoting Michael Ansel :
>
> >[true|false|1|2|3|..]. style directive in the main XML)? I'd be
> >interested in putting something together if it is a feasible addition
> >and someone can point me to the general area of the code
Quoting Michael Ansel :
[...]
How hard would something like this (staggered boot order) be to
add/integrate with an optional, external config file (or as a
Disclaimer: I have no clue as to how difficult it would be to add
or integrate.
However, considering that the boot order is most likel
Quick intro since this is my first post to the list: My name is
Michael Ansel, and I am third year Electrical and Computer Engineering
/ Computer Science double major at Duke University in Durham, North
Carolina. I've done a little bit of work off and on over the past
several years with virtualizat
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:23:27AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:01:06PM +0200, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
> > So, if finally there is some kind of incompatibility with OpenNebula
> > using Apache2, we have a couple of options:
> >
> > 1- use the conditional compilatio
The patches for secure migration raise an interesting question wrt
the handling of data streams and their effects on the internal driver
API and the public API. Although the migration helper APIs are not
technically public, they do map onto the remote wire protocol and as
such we have the same long
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:01:06PM +0200, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> First, thank you very much for improving the OpenNebula driver with
> your comments. I am totally agree with you suggestion about the
> configure.in, it should be a quick fix.
>
> Regarding the licenses, I do not r
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 02:08:53PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 04:07:12PM +0200, "Abel Míguez Rodríguez" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:32:18AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > Here is the One driver & patches for the current git's
> [...
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >>> The other possibility was to use the libraries they provide to
> >>>interconnect, but there was a licencing problem, plus you can't expect
> >>>to have thing installed on the server, so this was a dead
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:51:07PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Is there a way that you can set the guests startup order and stagger
> their startup at boot?
Hum, no. We only have the autostart flag on the domain but nothing
about ordering of starts on a wider basis.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:01:06PM +0200, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> First, thank you very much for improving the OpenNebula driver with
> your comments. I am totally agree with you suggestion about the
> configure.in, it should be a quick fix.
Okay :-)
> Regarding the licenses,
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 19:52 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> Gerry Reno wrote:
> > Gerry Reno wrote:
> > > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 03:43:12PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I upgraded the host from F10 to F11 (x86_64) with no issues. Now
> > > > > whe
22 matches
Mail list logo
