On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:05:36AM +0200, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> >> We are working on a new tunnelled migration scheme that will be
> >> uniform across drivers.
> > ic - To be honest, I was confused by the migrateuri anyhow, since I
> > considered the situation where libvirt traffic is tunneled
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:46:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:42:50PM +0200, Gregor Schaffrath wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Short summary on DV's request ;)
> >
> > I ran into a problem migrating kvm machines with libvirt-
essarily an oversight over the free ports
on the receiving side. (I feel that the reason for the different syntax
including mandatory :port part was motivated by the wish to allow users
to specify ports on the sending side)
Cheers,
Gregor Schaffrath.
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list
