Thanks again Daniel.
All of this information is going to be very handy as we are going to start to
look at KVM and RHEL6 soon.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 10:48 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: Justin Clift; libvir-list
-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 10:30 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: Justin Clift; libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [libvirt] inability to open local read-only connection
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:15:04AM -0500, Tavares, John wrote:
> Should
Should the memory utilization as report from inside a guest match that as
reported by the hypervisor?? I think one of my QA engineers may have pointed
out a Windows guest where this was not the case.
-Original Message-
From: Tavares, John
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 10:04 AM
To
: Friday, August 20, 2010 9:58 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: Justin Clift; libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [libvirt] inability to open local read-only connection
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 08:49:50AM -0500, Tavares, John wrote:
> It is available via xm, so my point was if it can, why can't libvi
vided that data in a more
machine parseable format.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Clift [mailto:jcl...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 9:15 AM
To: Daniel P. Berrange
Cc: Tavares, John; libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [libvirt] inability to open local read-only connection
On
factor is are they running the same operating
systems.
This is something to keep in mind.
John
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 8:58 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Betley, Greg; Chen
additional information about the
guests, such as:
a) uptime
b) hostname
c) real operating system
Thanks again.
John
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 8:12 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@
Thanks! This is good to know.
John
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 8:12 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Betley, Greg; Chen, Jianjiun
Subject: Re: [libvirt] inability to open local read
]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 6:30 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Betley, Greg; Chen, Jianjiun
Subject: Re: [libvirt] inability to open local read-only connection
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 06:38:27AM -0500, Tavares, John wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Sorry it too
: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Chen, Jianjiun; Betley, Greg
Subject: Re: [libvirt] libvirt on x64
On 07/26/2010 12:17 PM, Tavares, John wrote:
> I think I finally found such a system running RHEL 5.5 on x64 and it does
> have both a 32-bit and 64-bit version of libvirt ins
I think I finally found such a system running RHEL 5.5 on x64 and it does have
both a 32-bit and 64-bit version of libvirt installed (0.6.3). Maybe this is
just a SLES issue??
-Original Message-
From: Tavares, John
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:01 PM
To: 'Eric Blake'
Cc: l
think that both should be installed by default.
Thanks.
John
-Original Message-
From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:37 PM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; Tomen Tse; Chen, Jianjiun; Betley, Greg
Subject: Re: [libvirt] libvirt on x64
[sorry
s.
John
-Original Message-----
From: Tavares, John
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:38 AM
To: 'Daniel P. Berrange'
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com; 'Tomen Tse'; Betley, Greg; Chen, Jianjiun; Tavares,
John
Subject: RE: [libvirt] inability to open local read-only connection
Importance:
I just logged onto the first X64 based machine with libvirt (0.3.3-18.5)
installed on it and I am only seeing the X64 based version of the shared
library. Here is what I am seeing:
$ rpm -qal libvirt | grep libvirt.so
/usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0
/usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0.3.3
Is there any reason why
executable I
was using. Please let me know if anything else is required to get this problem
resolved.
Thanks.
John
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 7:58 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject:
any cpu
$ cat /proc/stat | grep cpu
cpu 414247 1485212 523903 1116332612 350887 0 262 488367
cpu0 414247 1485212 523903 1116332612 350887 0 262 488367
-Original Message-
From: Tavares, John
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 7:19 AM
To: 'veill...@redhat.com'
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.c
...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 5:44 AM
To: Tavares, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [libvirt] cpu values
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 04:46:45PM -0600, Tavares, John wrote:
> I am trying to compare the results that I am getting on a RHEL 5.3 server
> using xm list
I am trying to compare the results that I am getting on a RHEL 5.3 server using
xm list (using libvirt.so.0.3.3) against both my Dom0 and my Linux DomU on the
same server to see if the cpu values match to what the kernel is reporting in
/proc/stat. Here is an example of what I am seeing on both
, John
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [libvirt] inability to open local read-only connection
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:34:02PM -0600, Tavares, John wrote:
> I have been experimenting with using libvirt (0.3.3) on a variety of
> systems (RHEL, CentOS and Oracle VM). I have run into an
I have been experimenting with using libvirt (0.3.3) on a variety of systems
(RHEL, CentOS and Oracle VM). I have run into an issue when I try to open a
local read-only connection to the hypervisor that is failing only on Oracle VM
server release 2.2.0. I have created a root owned setuid execu
20 matches
Mail list logo
