On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 14:57 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:52:31PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Another way you could imagine would be for the your router to act as an
> > IPv6 router for a delegated prefix, but I'm not sure how the ISP would
> > communicate
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
And the "Stateless autoconfiguration" diagram seems to be exactly what
I think we'd want. Every guest has a MAC addr so that deals with the
lower 64-bits of the adress, but how do we choose the upper 64-bits to
form our 'router advertisment'... Perhaps that's the bit th
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:52:31PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 18:15 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Do link-local addreses
> > let the guest communicate with outside world, or is only enablling the
> > VM-to-VM and VM-to-Host communications ?
>
> link-local ad
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 18:15 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:37:46AM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > However, with IPv6, the combination of link-local addresses, address
> > auto-configuration and network renumbering should largely eliminate
> > these problems.
>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:37:46AM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 17:15 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:09:58PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > > So, we want to install a default network which guests can connect to.
> > > This can be seen a
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 17:15 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:09:58PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > So, we want to install a default network which guests can connect to.
> > This can be seen as e.g. a replacement for xenbr0 as the default bridge
> > for xen guest
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:09:58PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> So, we want to install a default network which guests can connect to.
> This can be seen as e.g. a replacement for xenbr0 as the default bridge
> for xen guests.
> 2) IP address choice - I've randomly chosen 192.168.122.1/
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:09:58PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
> So, we want to install a default network which guests can connect to.
> This can be seen as e.g. a replacement for xenbr0 as the default bridge
> for xen guests.
>
> A few things concern me about the patch, see b
Hey,
So, we want to install a default network which guests can connect to.
This can be seen as e.g. a replacement for xenbr0 as the default bridge
for xen guests.
A few things concern me about the patch, see below for my thinking.
However, I'm happy to punt on all of these issues f
