On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:03:25AM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
> Hi Daniel
>
> I forgot the spelling check of comment.
> I contribute the patch that corrects the comment again.
>
> Moreever, because some return values were illegal, I corrected it.
Excellent, applied and commited,
thanks
: [Libvir] [PATCH] check the maximum of virtual CPU"
"Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:08:57PM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
> > Hi, Dan
> >
> > > > 1. When initially creating a VM
> > > > 2. When ch
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:08:57PM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
> Hi, Dan
>
> > > 1. When initially creating a VM
> > > 2. When changing the config of an inactive VM
> > > 3. When changing the config of a running VM
> > >
> Certainly, I had not considered concerning 1 and 2.
> So, I corrected
age of it.
Is it added as a command of virsh?
Or, is it used from virsh create and virsh start?
Signed-off-by: Masayuki Sunou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks
--
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Re: [Libvir]
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:42:35PM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
> I removed a needless part from the former patch.
>
> Add check the maxmum of virtual CPU.
I was thinking about how to make use of this new API in virt-manager
when I came up with a further complication :-) There are three scenario
mainGetMaxVcpus */
NULL, /* domainDumpXML */
NULL, /* listDefinedDomains */
NULL, /* numOfDefinedDomains */
-------
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] check the maximum of virtual CPU"
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:26:03PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> Hi, Dan
>
> Please omit follwoing code from Masayuki's patch.
> It reverses Mizushima's
Yes, no problem - noticed that already.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Pe
Hi, Dan
Please omit follwoing code from Masayuki's patch.
It reverses Mizushima's
@@ -511,10 +512,10 @@ xend_post(virConnectPtr xend, const char
} else if ((ret == 202) && (strstr(content, "failed") != NULL)) {
virXendError(xend, VIR_ERR_POST_FAILED, content);
ret = -1;
-
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:42:59PM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> > This looks like a bug in XenD that should be reported upstrem. If the
> > hypercall
> > is given an invalid value it should reject it and not screw up the whole
> > host.
> >
> I agree.
> I will consider it as a back
00000000 +0900
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static virDriver xenXMDriver = {
> xenXMDomainSetVcpus, /* domainSetVcpus */
> NULL, /* domainPinVcpu */
> NULL, /* domainGetVcpus */
> +NULL, /* domainGetMaxVcpus */
> xenXMDomainDumpXML, /* domainDumpXML */
>
xVcpus */
NULL, /* domainDumpXML */
NULL, /* listDefinedDomains */
NULL, /* numOfDefinedDomains */
--
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] check the maximum of virtual CPU"
"
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:02:03AM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
> Hi
>
> The maximum of virtual CPU is not guarded in virsh setvcpus now.
> Then, when 32767 was set to virtual CPU of virsh setvcpus, the problem
> that Xend became abnormal was detected.
>
> example:
> -
needed in the future.
Thanks,
Masayuki Sunou.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] check the maximum of virtual CPU"
""Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote:
> Masayuki Sunou wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > T
Masayuki Sunou wrote:
Hi
The maximum of virtual CPU is not guarded in virsh setvcpus now.
Then, when 32767 was set to virtual CPU of virsh setvcpus, the problem
that Xend became abnormal was detected.
example:
--
# virsh setv
Hi
The maximum of virtual CPU is not guarded in virsh setvcpus now.
Then, when 32767 was set to virtual CPU of virsh setvcpus, the problem
that Xend became abnormal was detected.
example:
--
# virsh setvcpus 0 32767
libvir: X
15 matches
Mail list logo
