On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 19:38 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:17:04PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 18:52 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:44:17PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >
> > > > Rather you sug
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:17:04PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 18:52 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:44:17PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> > > Rather you suggest that if people want to use bridging, then they
> > > should modify the d
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 18:52 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:44:17PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Rather you suggest that if people want to use bridging, then they
> > should modify the default network XML config by hand and not have the
> > latter option in t
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:44:17PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 14:40 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:27:02PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > >
> > > As I said in another mail, the way I'd imagined virt-install working
> > > would be tha
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 14:40 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:27:02PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 03:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > > Anyway, we now have two different syntaxes in the XML for defining what
> > > is more or less t
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:20:58PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 14:32 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:27:02PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 03:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > > > For the reverse Xen wil
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 14:32 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:27:02PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 03:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > For the reverse Xen will tell us what bridge device a
> > > guest is using, and we can reverse
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:27:02PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 03:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > Anyway, we now have two different syntaxes in the XML for defining what
> > is more or less the same thing which is a real PITA for the tools. It
> > is useful to h
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:27:02PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 03:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > To improve life for the tools though I'd like to do two things as a high
> > priority
> >
> > - Support managed networks in Xen - we can simply lookup the bridge
>
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 03:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Anyway, we now have two different syntaxes in the XML for defining what
> is more or less the same thing which is a real PITA for the tools. It
> is useful to have the distinct representations - one is for 'managed'
> bridges, and the
In Xen it is possible to configure a VIF to enslave with an arbitrary
bridge device using a fragment of XML like:
In this example I've enslaved to xenbr0 which is created by the Xen networking
script, but this will work with any bridge device really.
In QEMU the only brid
11 matches
Mail list logo
