On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:38:39AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This patch implements a storage pool based on logical volume
> management. The underlying implementation calls out to LVM
> on Linux. A future implementation for Solaris would use the
> ZFS pool support to achieve the same functi
"Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> > +for (i = 0 ; i < pool->def->source.ndevice ; i++) {
>> > +int fd;
>> > +char zeros[512];
>> > +memset(zeros, 0, sizeof(zeros));
...
>> is it really 512 or the block size on the device used ? But 512 is
>> probab
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:46:28PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:43:11AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * LVM requires that the first 512 bytes are blanked if using
> > > + * a whole disk as a PV. So we just blank them
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:43:11AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > diff -r 31abfd8687b3 qemud/qemud.c
> > --- a/qemud/qemud.c Thu Feb 07 13:44:25 2008 -0500
> > +++ b/qemud/qemud.c Thu Feb 07 14:17:16 2008 -0500
> > @@ -2089,7 +2089,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> >
> > if (pipe(s
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:38:39AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This patch implements a storage pool based on logical volume
> management. The underlying implementation calls out to LVM
> on Linux. A future implementation for Solaris would use the
> ZFS pool support to achieve the same functi
This patch implements a storage pool based on logical volume
management. The underlying implementation calls out to LVM
on Linux. A future implementation for Solaris would use the
ZFS pool support to achieve the same functionality. The LVM
impl uses the LVM command line tools, in particular lvs, an
