Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-09 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 04:44 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > In general I really prefer restartable daemons especially if the client can > auto restart them if they are gone missing, it makes users and sysadmins > life so much easier (and avoid the need to start the daemon at bootup, which > is y

Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-09 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 03:25 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Thinking about later RPM upgrades I think we need to think about whether it > will be possible to restart the libvirt_qemud while guests & networks are > running. If I had time, I'd give some serious thought as to whether we ne

Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:02:55PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >>On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:47:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >>>Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Thinking about later RPM upgrades I think we need to think about

Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:47:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Thinking about later RPM upgrades I think we need to think about whether it will be possible to restart the libvirt_qemud while guests & networks a

Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:47:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Thinking about later RPM upgrades I think we need to think about whether it will be possible to restart the libvirt_qemud while guests & networks are running. There's a couple

Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-09 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:47:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >Thinking about later RPM upgrades I think we need to think about whether it > >will be possible to restart the libvirt_qemud while guests & networks are > >running. There's a couple of issues: > > > >

Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Thinking about later RPM upgrades I think we need to think about whether it will be possible to restart the libvirt_qemud while guests & networks are running. There's a couple of issues: - We do waitpid() to cleanup qemu & dnsmasq processes when we stop domains & ne

Re: [Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-09 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:25:44AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Thinking about later RPM upgrades I think we need to think about whether it > will be possible to restart the libvirt_qemud while guests & networks are > running. There's a couple of issues: > > - We do waitpid() to cleanup qem

[Libvir] Restarting of libvirt_qemud daemon

2007-03-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
Thinking about later RPM upgrades I think we need to think about whether it will be possible to restart the libvirt_qemud while guests & networks are running. There's a couple of issues: - We do waitpid() to cleanup qemu & dnsmasq processes when we stop domains & networks, or to detect when th