On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:48:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>I know that this is not a libvirt issue but this badly impacts libvirt
>usage.
>Is anyone aware of any status on this issue ? Daniel ?
>Here is some history I could get from the libvirt mailing list
Hi all,
I know that this is not a libvirt issue but this badly impacts libvirt
usage.
Is anyone aware of any status on this issue ? Daniel ?
Here is some history I could get from the libvirt mailing list :
* October 12, 2006 (Daniel Berrange).
I've been trying to track down just why talking to X
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 01:19:48AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > Well, you've hit upon a good question here. Is virsh interactive, or
> > scriptable? Within Sun we generally attempt to clearly delineate these
> > things, precisely for reasons like the above.
>
> well to me clearly it was de
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:31:56PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:44:31PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > > Am I the only one who finds the default behaviour of virsh list really
> > > confusing and annoying? That is, I would like --all to be the default.
> >
> > Me
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:44:31PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Am I the only one who finds the default behaviour of virsh list really
> > confusing and annoying? That is, I would like --all to be the default.
>
> Me too, but can we change it without breaking scripts or similar?
Well, yo
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:09:49PM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> Am I the only one who finds the default behaviour of virsh list really
> confusing and annoying? That is, I would like --all to be the default.
Me too, but can we change it without breaking scripts or similar?
Rich.
--
Richard Jon
Am I the only one who finds the default behaviour of virsh list really
confusing and annoying? That is, I would like --all to be the default.
regards
john
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
