On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:41:06PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:48:55PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > I've just looked at the behaviour on Xen 3.2.0 and it doesn't match
> > what you describe - there's always a type=vnc added even for legacy
> > config syntax. So
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:48:55PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I've just looked at the behaviour on Xen 3.2.0 and it doesn't match
> what you describe - there's always a type=vnc added even for legacy
> config syntax. So I think this must be a 3.0.4 specific XenD bug. I
> don't have any 3.0
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:09:40PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:47:58AM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> > I have an old HVM guest defined in 3.0.4, and now I'm running 3.1.2 and
> > libvirt 0.4.0. The config looks like this:
>
> Dan (Berrange) has looked at this somewhat. He
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:09:40PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:47:58AM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> > I have an old HVM guest defined in 3.0.4, and now I'm running 3.1.2 and
> > libvirt 0.4.0. The config looks like this:
>
> Dan (Berrange) has looked at this somewhat. He
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:47:58AM +, John Levon wrote:
> I have an old HVM guest defined in 3.0.4, and now I'm running 3.1.2 and
> libvirt 0.4.0. The config looks like this:
Dan (Berrange) has looked at this somewhat. He feels (probably rightly)
that it's xend's bug. However these versions a
I have an old HVM guest defined in 3.0.4, and now I'm running 3.1.2 and
libvirt 0.4.0. The config looks like this:
(domain
(image
(hvm
(vnc 1)
(vncdisplay 0)
(device
(vfb
(location localhost:5900)
(vncdisplay 0)
(uuid ...)
The libvirt code looks like this:
1757 /* Graph
