On 4/4/23 20:10, skran wrote:
> Thank you for the corrections. I understand it now.
> [1] I have made the Graphics Transport validation function static and moved
> its call out of the parser, to virDomainGraphicsDefListensValidate() in
> domain_validate.h. Is this a correct implementation?, it do
Thank you for the corrections. I understand it now.
[1] I have made the Graphics Transport validation function static and moved its
call out of the parser, to virDomainGraphicsDefListensValidate() in
domain_validate.h. Is this a correct implementation?, it does pass the tests.
I have removed the
Thank you for the corrections. I understand it now.
[1] I have made the Graphics Transport validation function static and moved its
call out of the parser, to virDomainGraphicsDefListensValidate() in
domain_validate.h. Is this a correct implementation?, it does pass the tests.
I have removed the
On 4/3/23 19:08, skran wrote:
> I have implemented your corrections successfully. Thank you.
This is not a commit message that describes what the patch does. If you
look at git log you'll see plenty of good examples. The idea is that
anybody reading through git log would understand what the commit
I have implemented your corrections successfully. Thank you.
Signed-off-by: K Shiva
---
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 42 +++-
src/conf/domain_validate.c | 56 ++
src/conf/domain_validate.h | 7 +
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3
