On 3/11/20 12:12 PM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
On 11.03.2020 12:38, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 3/5/20 3:47 PM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
Sync was introduced in [1] to check for ga presence. This
check is racy but in the era before serial events are available
there was not better solution
On 11.03.2020 12:38, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 3/5/20 3:47 PM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
>> Sync was introduced in [1] to check for ga presence. This
>> check is racy but in the era before serial events are available
>> there was not better solution I guess.
>
> Can you elaborate more on t
On 3/5/20 3:47 PM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
Sync was introduced in [1] to check for ga presence. This
check is racy but in the era before serial events are available
there was not better solution I guess.
Can you elaborate more on the raciness? There should never be more than
one thread tal
Sync was introduced in [1] to check for ga presence. This
check is racy but in the era before serial events are available
there was not better solution I guess.
In case we have the events the sync function is different. It allows us
to flush stateless ga channel from remnants of previous communica
