Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back from a not-so-funny moment :(
>
> I'm impressed by the work done once I was away ! Thanx !
>
> I've tried to test it :
>
> - uninstalled debian package libvirt-bin (running ubuntu server 8.04 LTS)
> - checked-out CVS version
> - ./autobuild.sh --with-xen=n
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:17:04PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
> Hi,
> Back from a not-so-funny moment :(
>
> I'm impressed by the work done once I was away ! Thanx !
>
> I've tried to test it :
>
> - uninstalled debian package libvirt-bin (running ubuntu server 8.04 LTS)
no idea what libvi
Hi,
Back from a not-so-funny moment :(
I'm impressed by the work done once I was away ! Thanx !
I've tried to test it :
- uninstalled debian package libvirt-bin (running ubuntu server 8.04 LTS)
- checked-out CVS version
- ./autobuild.sh --with-xen=no
- make
- sudo make install
Running virsh tel
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:43:15AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:24:01PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > New patch with just a pair of minor fixes which seems to work just fine
> > for
> > me. The syntax is nearly the old one, just use host instead of statichost
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:43:15AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:24:01PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > New patch with just a pair of minor fixes which seems to work just fine
> > for
> > me. The syntax is nearly the old one, just use host instead of statichost
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:24:01PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:39:28PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:49:59PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > T
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:39:28PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:49:59PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > >
> > > That said I'm working on a new version of the patch which would be
> > > ad
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:39:28PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:49:59PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > >
> > > That said I'm working on a new version of the patch which would be
> > > ad
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:49:59PM +0200, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > That said I'm working on a new version of the patch which would be adequate
[...]
> Once again, if I can do anything to help, I will.
Then please
