On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:56:49AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Without the first change below, "make distcheck" would fail due to the
> absence of po/no.po. But that file was deliberately removed, because
> np.po supersedes it.
Oops, right, I forgot to update the list
> However, there is no n
Without the first change below, "make distcheck" would fail due to the
absence of po/no.po. But that file was deliberately removed, because
np.po supersedes it.
I've just committed this first change.
[however, see below it]
>From 0ebd43afa961b6a1b0d5676920c2109d8adae56c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
