On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:55:50PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 04:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> >
> > Currently each USB2 companion controller gets put on a separate
> > PCI slot. Not only is this wasteful of PCI slots, but it is not
> > in complia
On 05/14/2012 04:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
>
> Currently each USB2 companion controller gets put on a separate
> PCI slot. Not only is this wasteful of PCI slots, but it is not
> in compliance with the spec for USB2 controllers. The master
> echi1 and all compa
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:06:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for working on this. I've little useful feedback atm
> I'm afraid, but I do have a question based on reading the xml
> for the tests, is it necessary to set the startports explicitly?
> or do they get the correct defau
Hi,
Thanks for working on this. I've little useful feedback atm
I'm afraid, but I do have a question based on reading the xml
for the tests, is it necessary to set the startports explicitly?
or do they get the correct default based on the model, ie uhci1
startport 0, uhci startport 2, etc?
Regar
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
Currently each USB2 companion controller gets put on a separate
PCI slot. Not only is this wasteful of PCI slots, but it is not
in compliance with the spec for USB2 controllers. The master
echi1 and all companion controllers should be in the same slot,
with echi1 in fun
