On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 08:03:09AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 06:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The virCommandNewArgs() method would free the virCommandPtr
> > if it failed to add the args. This meant errors reported in
> > virCommandAddArgSet() were lost. Simply removing the ch
On 03/15/2011 06:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The virCommandNewArgs() method would free the virCommandPtr
> if it failed to add the args. This meant errors reported in
> virCommandAddArgSet() were lost. Simply removing the check
> for errors from the constructor means they can be reported
> c
On 03/15/2011 08:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The virCommandNewArgs() method would free the virCommandPtr
if it failed to add the args. This meant errors reported in
virCommandAddArgSet() were lost. Simply removing the check
for errors from the constructor means they can be reported
correctly
The virCommandNewArgs() method would free the virCommandPtr
if it failed to add the args. This meant errors reported in
virCommandAddArgSet() were lost. Simply removing the check
for errors from the constructor means they can be reported
correctly later
The virCommandAddEnvPassCommon() method fail
