Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 05:16:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> The attached patch fixes a possible segfault if trying
>> to start a domain which tries to use an inactive
>> virtual network. We should explicitly catch that error
>> and report it, but that's a separate pat
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 05:16:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> The attached patch fixes a possible segfault if trying
> to start a domain which tries to use an inactive
> virtual network. We should explicitly catch that error
> and report it, but that's a separate patch.
Fix looks fine to me,
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 05:16:43PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> The attached patch fixes a possible segfault if trying
> to start a domain which tries to use an inactive
> virtual network. We should explicitly catch that error
> and report it, but that's a separate patch.
ACK
Daniel
--
|: Red H
The attached patch fixes a possible segfault if trying
to start a domain which tries to use an inactive
virtual network. We should explicitly catch that error
and report it, but that's a separate patch.
Thanks,
Cole
commit eca87f821890c7d54f2ba57288acad1b234ec13e
Author: Cole Robinson <[EMAIL PROT