Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Introduce virFilePrintf() as a portable fprintf()

2013-05-31 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/17/2013 08:34 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/17/2013 08:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" >> >> We can't use GNULIB's fprintf-posix due to licensing >> incompatibilities. We do already have a portable >> formatting via virAsprintf() which we got from GNULIB >> tho

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Introduce virFilePrintf() as a portable fprintf()

2013-05-17 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/17/2013 08:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" > > We can't use GNULIB's fprintf-posix due to licensing > incompatibilities. We do already have a portable > formatting via virAsprintf() which we got from GNULIB > though. We can use to create a virFilePrintf() funct

[libvirt] [PATCH] Introduce virFilePrintf() as a portable fprintf()

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" We can't use GNULIB's fprintf-posix due to licensing incompatibilities. We do already have a portable formatting via virAsprintf() which we got from GNULIB though. We can use to create a virFilePrintf() function. But really gnulib could just provide a 'fprintf' module,